Gabriel Roldan ha scritto: > Andrea Aime wrote: >> Gabriel Roldan ha scritto: >>> Hi Rini, >>> >>> you're right, it should be true that if the layer is disabled it >>> should not show up on getcaps. If it's not it's a bug ans as Andrea >>> pointed out one quite possibly left there as the result of the >>> resource/publish split not yet being finished. >> >> Oh boy. The bug is in this broken understanding that layer and resources >> are somewhat decoupled in the current trunk. They are not, this has been >> states a number of times already. >> >> Workspaces and namespaces are one. >> Layer and resources are one. A layer cannot be disabled without >> disabling the resource as well, if this is allowed, then this is the >> bug, not otherwise. >> Repeat with me: there is no resource/publish split in act. >> >> The current situation is transitional, to avoid making too many changes >> in one go and be stuck for 6 months recovering from the changes. >> >> I hope this clarifies things a little > Disregard you think I don't yet understand that. I should have said the > split not existing yet, my fault. My point was helping Rini take a > direction where she doesn't need to depend on a collateral effect of a > higher level entity (geoserver) to get her lower level one (the > DataAccess) to find the related resources it needs.
This confusion popped up a number of times and seeing it once again raised blood to my brain. Apologies for being rude :( Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
