I am not sure what I like the best ... i think I like (c) + Folder e) Folder / Service (supportin WMS, WFS, WCS, REST protocols) / Settings
But since that represents a change to every last thing I am not sure my recommendation is any good. On the bright side I really like the technical seperation here. Jody On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Justin Deoliveira<jdeol...@opengeo.org> wrote: > Yup, that looks like it, thanks for summing it up concisely Jody :) I think > I like (b) the best. > > -Justin > > Jody Garnett wrote: >> >> So what do we have ... >> >> a) Workspace / Map (publishing WMS, WFS, WCS services) / Profile >> b) Workspace / Context (publishing WMS, WFS, WCS services) / Profile >> c) Workspace / Profile (publishing WMS, WFS, WCS services) / Settings >> d) Workspace / Service (supporting WMS, WFS, WCS protocols) / Settings >> >> Did I miss anything? >> >> Jody >> >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Justin Deoliveira<jdeol...@opengeo.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> Not sure, but I think they call what we call a workspace a folder, which >>> is >>> know is something we discussed. As for a replacement name for map... How >>> do >>> others feel about "context". It is suitably abstract so it more or less >>> describes the concept ;), and is not tied to any preconceptions. >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> Andrea >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Justin Deoliveira >>> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org >>> Enterprise support for open source geospatial. >>> > > > -- > Justin Deoliveira > OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org > Enterprise support for open source geospatial. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
