I have been asked my opinions on the TEAM engine used for CITE tests. In the future we can expect more CITE tests, so it might be useful to ensure development is informed by our requirements.
The TEAM Engine forced me to use an interactive GUI, which I did not like. I would prefer something easier to automate and integrate with automated testing systems. This would allow us to set up, for example, a CITE Hudson. Is this easy to do with the TEAM Engine? Does anyone else have any opinions in the utility of the TEAM Engine currently used for the CITE tests? Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]> Software Engineer, CSIRO Exploration and Mining Australian Resources Research Centre 26 Dick Perry Ave, Kensington WA 6151, Australia ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
