On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Gabriel Roldan <grol...@opengeo.org> wrote: > Rest assured having the tile layer configuration so close to the > layer/group is "handy". Specially because of the monolithic gwc > configuration file, which would have to be overridden as a whole > every time a layer config changes. Which makes me think that perhaps > we could get the better of both worlds by keeping the geoserver tile > layer configuration as a separate file next to the layer.xml or > layergroup config file instead, as there's no room at least on the gwc > stable branch to change its configuration subsystem to stop being > monolithic.
A gwc.xml or tilecache.xml sidecar file would be good, especially if the contents of the file are already, or could become, large Cheers Andrea -- ------------------------------------------------------- Ing. Andrea Aime GeoSolutions S.A.S. Tech lead Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 962313 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/ http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime http://twitter.com/geowolf ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
