On 21/04/12 00:47, Andrea Aime wrote: > I'm just saying that we should _also_ start looking more actively into > RESTful equivalents of the OGC protocols to have a complete > (and up to date) set of options for data access. If we don't we risk > that our user base shrinks as people migrate to other implementations > offering what is perceived as a easier to use set of protocols.
WFS change request 11-080 "A REST binding for WFS 2.0" by Peter Vretanos is currently under consideration by WFS/FES SWG: https://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=44852 From here: http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/cr -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]> Software Engineer CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
