On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> wrote:
> The approach sounds fine, and I agree it is not really a format option.
>
> Aside: I am still keen to list available vendor options in the
> GetCapabilities vendor capabilities section (on the off chance we can
> "share" common vendor capabilities with MapServer and others). Is it
> feasible to use vendor capabilities? I feel not listing options here is a
> recurring mistake we are making.
>
When something bothers me, and it's not too hard to implement, I normally
go and create a pull request.
Here is a (non exaustive) list of vendor options as a starting point:
http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/user/services/wms/vendor.html
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information.
==
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Infragistics Professional
Build stunning WinForms apps today!
Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls.
Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
