On 16-12-28 12:10 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Mike Pumphrey <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I know I'm non-voting, but I agree with Jody's point here. Also, > to my mind, "opaque container" is better realized as "black box" > (fewer syllables too). > > But I think "basemap" might get more to the heart of how it would > be used. >
> If I can share my non binding opinion (I honestly don't care much), > basemap seems to be a bit specific, > while it's a legit use case of the functionality, one could also have > a group that cannot be broken up > in component parts meant to be used as an overlay (thus, no basemap). > I agree both that "opaque container" is a bit ugly and potentially confusing and that "basemap" is too specific. Maybe a "flat group"? -- Kevin Michael Smith <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
