I am obviously not in a place to approve / disapprove but I’ll add that
your breakdown makes a lot of sense to me.

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 9:30 AM Andrea Aime <andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it>
wrote:

> Hi,
> as with the thread on geotools-devel, there seems to be a distinct lack of
> enthusiams
> for the topic.
> Can at least get a sense if there are people opposed to the changes I'm
> proposing?
> I'd like to know before starting to split modules apart :-)
>
> Cheers
> Andreda
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Andrea Aime <andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> following up the geotools-devel thread on speeding up the build, I've
>> made some checks on
>> GeoServer as well.
>>
>> <aside>
>> Please let's not start a discussion about tests being integration and
>> thus slow, we all know that,
>> but I'm trying to discuss something that can be done with limited
>> resources here,
>> not planning the next 10 years of development or selling an idea for the
>> next code sprint :-)
>> (it's a fair conversation topic, if you want to start it please just do
>> so in a separate mail thread).
>> </aside>
>>
>> Compared to GeoTools the build takes longer because, among other reasons,
>> it parallelizes a lot less.
>> The "chain of death" keeping the build in low parallel mode is, roughly:
>> main->wfs->wms->restconfig->app-schema-test
>>
>> The main module takes here 1:20, and everything else depends on it. A
>> large chunk of that time is
>> spent running security related tests.
>> I'm only semi serious here, but as far as I can see, it could be
>> beneficial to move the securty
>> tests to their own module (e.g., security/core) while leaving the
>> security classes in main.
>> I'm just semi-serious because I realize splitting apart the classes and
>> their tests is not that great,
>> but at the same time, it could easily shave off 30-60 seconds off the
>> critical path.
>>
>> The WMS dependency onto WFS is hard to un-tangle, I've tried already some
>> years ago and
>> eventually gave up, it would require its own mini-sprint imho... so off
>> the board for this discussion.
>>
>> Restconfig is where things get interesting and actually doable in a
>> relatively short time.
>> Restconfig is a slow module to build, and has to wait onto all core OGC
>> services to be built, but it
>> does not have to be that way: I propose we split the service support part
>> into a small per service
>> module, e.g.:
>>
>>    - gs-restconfig-wfs
>>    - gs-restconfig-wms
>>    - gs-restconfig-wcs
>>    - gs-restconfig-wps (missing today, no way to configure WPS from REST)
>>    - gs-restconfig-csw (missing today, no way to configure CSW from REST)
>>
>> Basically gs-restconfig would contain the core abstract service
>> controller class, and the "one class modules"
>> would add the templates, extra code, and tests (side effect, we'd make
>> the service rest configuration
>> actually pluggable).
>> There are also 4-5 a few tests hitting the OGC services as part of the
>> tests, those could also be moved
>> to the service specific restconfig module.
>> This way the main gs-restconfig module could start building as soon as
>> gs-main has completed.
>>
>> The other module that should be split imho is the app-schema-test one, in
>> the current build, and
>> on my current machine, it runs alone for 55 seconds after any other
>> module has terminated building.
>> The reason being that it depends on too many things, wfs, wms,
>> restconfig.
>> I believe the module mostly does WFS tests with a few WMS and I believe
>> just one REST test, so can
>> we split it into three parts that can start running as soon as their
>> dependencies are made available?
>>
>>    - app-schema-wfs-test
>>    - app-schema-wms-test
>>    - app-schema-rest-test
>>
>> Cheers
>> Andrea
>>
>> ==
>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
>> http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
>> ==
>>
>> Ing. Andrea Aime
>> @geowolf
>> Technical Lead
>>
>> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
>> Via di Montramito 3/A
>> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
>> phone: +39 0584 962313 <+39%200584%20962313>
>> fax: +39 0584 1660272 <+39%200584%20166%200272>
>> mob: +39  339 8844549 <+39%20339%20884%204549>
>>
>> http://www.geo-solutions.it
>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>>
>> AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003
>>
>> Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
>> nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
>> loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
>> per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
>> messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
>> darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
>> stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
>> divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
>> utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
>> principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
>>
>> The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely
>> for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential
>> or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
>> (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
>> Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
>> copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
>> strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
>> addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
>> immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
>> information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
>> does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
>> completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
>> made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
>> e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Andrea Aime
>
> ==
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
> http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
> ==
>
> Ing. Andrea Aime
> @geowolf
> Technical Lead
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via di Montramito 3/A
> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
> phone: +39 0584 962313 <+39%200584%20962313>
> fax: +39 0584 1660272 <+39%200584%20166%200272>
> mob: +39  339 8844549 <+39%20339%20884%204549>
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003
>
> Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
> nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
> loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
> per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
> messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
> darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
> stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
> divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
> utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
> principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
>
> The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
> the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
> proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
> (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
> Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
> copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
> strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
> addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
> immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
> information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
> does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
> completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
> made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
> e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to