Thanks Simone: The GeoPkgDataStoreFactoryInitilizer is Datastore specific, and the Datastore was added to core some time ago and apparently this helper class helps the geotools datastore factory operate correctly. - I am not sure why the initilier was not added at the time (its job is to communicate the data directory, rather than the program directory, as the base path for a relative filename). - The javadoc example shows a shapefile datastore initializer, but that is no longer in the codebase anywhere that I can see - It could be that the GeoPkgDataStoreFactoryInitilizer is not needed? If so it could be removed ...
The wps download service provides an option to download a very simple geopackage, look to be sufficient for my customer's needs. This gives the wps community module longer to be worked on. -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 at 01:22, Simone Giannecchini < simone.giannecch...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote: > Hi Jody, > I am +0 now. > Two things: > - I don't want to be involved too much with the coding but this part > surprised me: > "To migrate to core: GeoPkgDataStoreFactoryInitializer.java this should of > been done previously as part of adding datastore support" > Do we really need to have plugin specific code in core? Is it a leftover? > - what happened to the WPS part? > > Regards, > Simone Giannecchini > == > GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! > Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services for more information. > == > Ing. Simone Giannecchini > @simogeo > Founder/Director GeoSolutions Italy > President GeoSolutions USA > > phone: +39 0584 962313 > fax: +39 0584 1660272 > mob: +39 333 8128928 > > http://www.geosolutionsgroup.com > http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is > addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or > otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by > European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this > e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended > recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please > notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail. > > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 6:48 AM Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Simone, please review the revised proposal: >> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-206 >> >> For anyone else who voted previously you may wish to double check your >> response. >> -- >> Jody Garnett >> >> >> On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 at 17:46, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the clarification Simone, I will update the proposal >>> accordingly. >>> -- >>> Jody Garnett >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 at 13:06, Simone Giannecchini < >>> simone.giannecch...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote: >>> >>>> "or any variation over this" means that you can propose something >>>> different from what I propose as long as it does not involve GPKG formats >>>> for WMS and WFS to end up in core right away. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Simone Giannecchini >>>> == >>>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! >>>> Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services for more information. >>>> == >>>> Ing. Simone Giannecchini >>>> @simogeo >>>> Founder/Director GeoSolutions Italy >>>> President GeoSolutions USA >>>> >>>> phone: +39 0584 962313 >>>> fax: +39 0584 1660272 >>>> mob: +39 333 8128928 >>>> >>>> http://www.geosolutionsgroup.com >>>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is >>>> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or >>>> otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by >>>> European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this >>>> e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended >>>> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please >>>> notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 9:50 PM Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I am not sure I understand your statement "or any variation over this" >>>>> - what do you mean? >>>>> >>>>> I am presently trying to make sure I understand your feedback here, >>>>> and testing fixes for geopackage axis order (GEOS-8793,GEOT-7011). >>>>> -- >>>>> Jody Garnett >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 at 11:57, Simone Giannecchini < >>>>> simone.giannecch...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Jody, >>>>>> no my proposal is: >>>>>> - GPKG output for WMS and WFS becomes an official extension >>>>>> - GPKG output for WPS gets folded in WPS >>>>>> or any variation over this. >>>>>> >>>>>> I am not confident in having GPKG output for WMS and FS jump directly >>>>>> into core but we shall try to find a middle ground to not block your >>>>>> work. >>>>>> Feel free to propose something else along these lines. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Simone Giannecchini >>>>>> == >>>>>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! >>>>>> Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services for more information. >>>>>> == >>>>>> Ing. Simone Giannecchini >>>>>> @simogeo >>>>>> Founder/Director GeoSolutions Italy >>>>>> President GeoSolutions USA >>>>>> >>>>>> phone: +39 0584 962313 >>>>>> fax: +39 0584 1660272 >>>>>> mob: +39 333 8128928 >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.geosolutionsgroup.com >>>>>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is >>>>>> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or >>>>>> otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by >>>>>> European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of >>>>>> this >>>>>> e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended >>>>>> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, >>>>>> please >>>>>> notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 3:29 PM Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Simone >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So the counter proposal is to take WFS and WMS into their own (very >>>>>>> small) extensions, and leave WPS functionality behind as a community >>>>>>> module. I am aware that the wps download extension offers very simple >>>>>>> geopackage output for a single layer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I will need to check if that is okay. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jody >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 1:37 AM Simone Giannecchini < >>>>>>> simone.giannecch...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Jody, >>>>>>>> I second what Andrea said, I'd be much more confident if we >>>>>>>> followed the usual path and we made the gpkg output for WMS and WFS as >>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>> official extension. >>>>>>>> In time we can move it to core but at the moment I still don't feel >>>>>>>> like these modules are ready. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Let me know what you think. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Simone Giannecchini >>>>>>>> == >>>>>>>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! >>>>>>>> Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services for more information. >>>>>>>> == >>>>>>>> Ing. Simone Giannecchini >>>>>>>> @simogeo >>>>>>>> Founder/Director GeoSolutions Italy >>>>>>>> President GeoSolutions USA >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> phone: +39 0584 962313 >>>>>>>> fax: +39 0584 1660272 >>>>>>>> mob: +39 333 8128928 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.geosolutionsgroup.com >>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is >>>>>>>> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential >>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>> otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by >>>>>>>> European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of >>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>> e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended >>>>>>>> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, >>>>>>>> please >>>>>>>> notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:49 AM Andrea Aime < >>>>>>>> andrea.a...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Jody, >>>>>>>>> the checklist should be part of the proposal ;-) >>>>>>>>> Maybe Simone's worries can be addressed by just upgrading the >>>>>>>>> module as an extension, instead of splitting it and folding it into >>>>>>>>> core >>>>>>>>> modules? >>>>>>>>> The gs-wms and gs-wfs have somehow limited usage anyways, can only >>>>>>>>> be used to make small exports that would not trigger an HTTP timeout >>>>>>>>> (I have seen 1 to 5 minutes timeouts in pratical deploys). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>>> Andrea >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 3:16 AM Jody Garnett < >>>>>>>>> jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Simone, this is the definition of slow moving and not urgent. I >>>>>>>>>> first asked if this was a good idea around 2 years ago as a customer >>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>> interested. Procurement moves slowly, funding has now come through >>>>>>>>>> to do >>>>>>>>>> this activity. The customer has been using geopackage WFS output for >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> least three years. Indeed this funding is as a result of a review of >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> community modules the customer is using in production, and asking if >>>>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>>> would be interested in helping it be cleaned up and made into an >>>>>>>>>> official >>>>>>>>>> extension. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> While I do not have a sizable number of clients, once this >>>>>>>>>> functionality has been cleaned up I will be adding it to the geocat >>>>>>>>>> enterprise products for all our customers (presently it is an option >>>>>>>>>> by >>>>>>>>>> request). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Let's review the checklist: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *1. The module has at least a “handful” of users.* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have three users of this functionality, only one I would >>>>>>>>>> consider as using it in production. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *2. The module has a designated and active maintainer* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I offered to join Andrea on this (on the assumption the >>>>>>>>>> functionality can be cleaned up and be included in geocat enterprise >>>>>>>>>> products). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *3. The module is considered “stable” by the majority of the PSC* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I checked in with this on november/decemeber expecting wfs and >>>>>>>>>> wps to be stable and wms output format to be removed. Andrea asked >>>>>>>>>> me to >>>>>>>>>> revise the proposal to include gs-wms. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So far my personal testing has been mixed, EPSG:4326 output is >>>>>>>>>> coming out in Y/X order which does not match up with the >>>>>>>>>> specification: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The axis order in WKB stored in a GeoPackage follows the de facto >>>>>>>>>> standard for axis order in WKB and is therefore always (x,y{,z}{,m}) >>>>>>>>>> where >>>>>>>>>> x is easting or longitude, y is northing or latitude, z is optional >>>>>>>>>> elevation, and m is optional measure. This ordering explicitly >>>>>>>>>> overrides >>>>>>>>>> the axis order as specified in the SRS metadata, applying Case 4 >>>>>>>>>> from OGC >>>>>>>>>> 08-038r7, Revision to Axis Order Policy and Recommendations[K11]. >>>>>>>>>> This was >>>>>>>>>> done to maintain consistency with previous implementations of WKB >>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>> predated the OGC policy. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The above indicates additional QA is needed. You can also see the >>>>>>>>>> proposal where I noted frustration with a couple design decisions. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *4. The module maintains 40% test coverage* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The coverage looks good, but I have not measured it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *5. The module has no IP violations.* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So far everything seems to be original work, with links to OGC >>>>>>>>>> where appropriate. If something comes up during the activity I will >>>>>>>>>> let you >>>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *6. The module has a page in the user manual* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Not directly useful as the documentation will be distributed >>>>>>>>>> across several pages: >>>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>>> https://docs.geoserver.org/stable/en/user/community/geopkg/index.html >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I also note geosolutions has training materials >>>>>>>>>> https://docs.geoserver.geo-solutions.it/edu/en/wps/geopackage_output.html >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *7. The maintainer has signed the GeoServer Contributor Agreement* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> OSGeo has a signed CLA from both myself and GeoCat BV. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Jody Garnett >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 at 14:23, Simone Giannecchini < >>>>>>>>>> simone.giannecch...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Good Morning Jody, >>>>>>>>>>> I am not too inclined on having the gpkg output jump from >>>>>>>>>>> community to core for WMS and WFS. >>>>>>>>>>> The process we have in place is there to exactly prevent >>>>>>>>>>> something like this from happening because "someone needs it >>>>>>>>>>> urgently". >>>>>>>>>>> I mean, have you been using them in production enough to be >>>>>>>>>>> confident with them? Do you already have a sizable number of >>>>>>>>>>> clients using >>>>>>>>>>> the extensions so we can trust them? I guess not given what you said >>>>>>>>>>> above... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> For the moment my vote is a -1 on this, but I am happy to hear >>>>>>>>>>> your thoughts on my points above. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>> Simone Giannecchini >>>>>>>>>>> == >>>>>>>>>>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! >>>>>>>>>>> Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services for more information. >>>>>>>>>>> == >>>>>>>>>>> Ing. Simone Giannecchini >>>>>>>>>>> @simogeo >>>>>>>>>>> Founder/Director GeoSolutions Italy >>>>>>>>>>> President GeoSolutions USA >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> phone: +39 0584 962313 >>>>>>>>>>> fax: +39 0584 1660272 >>>>>>>>>>> mob: +39 333 8128928 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.geosolutionsgroup.com >>>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it >>>>>>>>>>> is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, >>>>>>>>>>> confidential >>>>>>>>>>> or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as >>>>>>>>>>> provided by >>>>>>>>>>> European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use >>>>>>>>>>> of this >>>>>>>>>>> e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended >>>>>>>>>>> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by >>>>>>>>>>> mistake, please >>>>>>>>>>> notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 1:50 AM Jody Garnett < >>>>>>>>>>> jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Proposal is renamed. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> With respect to gs-wps module I would like to see the matching >>>>>>>>>>>> gt-wps unsupported module which forms its foundation cleaned up >>>>>>>>>>>> (finally). >>>>>>>>>>>> Something we can discuss in the new year. >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Jody Garnett >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 at 07:40, Jody Garnett < >>>>>>>>>>>> jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Andrea, I will rename the proposal. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have capacity to support the wps module on this one (as >>>>>>>>>>>>> indeed a customer is funding this activity). >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jody >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 5:11 AM Andrea Aime < >>>>>>>>>>>>> andrea.a...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jody, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking the proposal, I believe the title is misleading, it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> seems to suggest a classic module move from community to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> extension, as >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is... which does not match the actual proposal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The actual proposal is: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fold the WFS output format gs-wfs, the WMS output >>>>>>>>>>>>>> format in gs-wms, hence, move these two bits in _core_ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fold the WPS process in gs-wps-core >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> About the move to cover of the WMS/WFS output formats, from a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> technical point of view I'm not concerned: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - The WFS output format will eventually break for large >>>>>>>>>>>>>> outputs due to HTTP time outs (needs to be written on disk >>>>>>>>>>>>>> first, streamed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> back once complete), but the same already happens for zipped >>>>>>>>>>>>>> shapefiles, so >>>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing really new >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - The WMS output format now honors the rendering time >>>>>>>>>>>>>> outs, so it should be fine >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I should however point out that the core of GeoServer is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "maintained by the PSC" so the rest of the PSC should be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comfortable having >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that code in core, and realize the associated obligation. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> About the move of the WPS process to wps-core, I'm also >>>>>>>>>>>>>> personally not deeply concerned, if the documentation >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is very clear about the experimental extensions baked into >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the process (so doc updates are needed). >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm however noting the code moving also moves >>>>>>>>>>>>>> its maintainership from "nobody" to me (the WPS module >>>>>>>>>>>>>> maintainer), which >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not too fond of [1]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since you're making the proposal, I'd like you to step up as >>>>>>>>>>>>>> co-maintainer of the code you're trying to push up. For the core >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bits, as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> PSC member, you're taking that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> responsibility automatically anyways. Please step up to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> co-maintain the processes once moved in gs-wps-core. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] Due to both project and business obligations I'm >>>>>>>>>>>>>> responsible for way too many modules already, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> something which is too big of a onus on my shoulders, and a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> big project liability in case I get sick >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or decide to leave. It's something we'll have to address, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> possibly sooner rather than later. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 5:28 AM Jody Garnett < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please have a look at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-206 which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outlines moving different sections of the geopackage community >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> module into >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the appropriate core module: gs-wfs, gs-wms, and gs-wps. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The proposal is solid, please make note of the backwards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compatibility section which proposes calling out wps geopackage >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supports >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for not yet finalized extensions. While there is nothing wrong >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with having >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> geoserver specific extensions they should be documented as such >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and marked >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as in progress if they are chasing a moving target). If folks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strongly about documentation not being enough warning I can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look at leaving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these geopackage extensions as an optional install. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jody >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jody Garnett >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Geoserver-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea Aime >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> == >>>>>>>>>>>>>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services-us for more information. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> == >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ing. Andrea Aime >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @geowolf >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Technical Lead >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> GeoSolutions Group >>>>>>>>>>>>>> phone: +39 0584 962313 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fax: +39 0584 1660272 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> mob: +39 333 8128928 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati >>>>>>>>>>>>>> personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla >>>>>>>>>>>>>> protezione dei >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla >>>>>>>>>>>>>> presente email >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui >>>>>>>>>>>>>> conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo >>>>>>>>>>>>>> scrivente. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cancellarlo, ogni >>>>>>>>>>>>>> altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse >>>>>>>>>>>>>> darmene >>>>>>>>>>>>>> notizia. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that - as >>>>>>>>>>>>>> provided by European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dissemination or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> use of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other >>>>>>>>>>>>>> than the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this >>>>>>>>>>>>>> email by >>>>>>>>>>>>>> mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jody Garnett >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> Geoserver-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Andrea Aime >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> == >>>>>>>>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services-us for more information. >>>>>>>>> == >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ing. Andrea Aime >>>>>>>>> @geowolf >>>>>>>>> Technical Lead >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> GeoSolutions Group >>>>>>>>> phone: +39 0584 962313 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> fax: +39 0584 1660272 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> mob: +39 333 8128928 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali >>>>>>>>> (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati >>>>>>>>> “GDPR”), >>>>>>>>> si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo >>>>>>>>> contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è >>>>>>>>> riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il >>>>>>>>> messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra >>>>>>>>> operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene >>>>>>>>> notizia. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it >>>>>>>>> is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, >>>>>>>>> confidential >>>>>>>>> or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided >>>>>>>>> by >>>>>>>>> European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use >>>>>>>>> of this >>>>>>>>> e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended >>>>>>>>> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, >>>>>>>>> please >>>>>>>>> notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Jody Garnett >>>>>>> >>>>>>
_______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
