Thanks Simone:

The GeoPkgDataStoreFactoryInitilizer is Datastore specific, and the
Datastore was added to core some time ago and apparently this helper class
helps the geotools datastore factory operate correctly.
- I am not sure why the initilier was not added at the time (its job is to
communicate the data directory, rather than the program directory, as the
base path for a relative filename).
- The javadoc example shows a shapefile datastore initializer, but that is
no longer in the codebase anywhere that I can see
- It could be that the GeoPkgDataStoreFactoryInitilizer is not needed? If
so it could be removed ...

The wps download service provides an option to download a very simple
geopackage, look to be sufficient for my customer's needs. This gives the
wps community module longer to be worked on.
--
Jody Garnett


On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 at 01:22, Simone Giannecchini <
simone.giannecch...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote:

> Hi Jody,
> I am +0 now.
> Two things:
> - I don't want to be involved too much with the coding but this part
> surprised me:
> "To migrate to core: GeoPkgDataStoreFactoryInitializer.java this should of
> been done previously as part of adding datastore support"
> Do we really need to have plugin specific code in core? Is it a leftover?
> - what happened to the WPS part?
>
> Regards,
> Simone Giannecchini
> ==
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
> Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services for more information.
> ==
> Ing. Simone Giannecchini
> @simogeo
> Founder/Director GeoSolutions Italy
> President GeoSolutions USA
>
> phone: +39 0584 962313
> fax:     +39 0584 1660272
> mob:   +39  333 8128928
>
> http://www.geosolutionsgroup.com
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
> otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by
> European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this
> e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please
> notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 6:48 AM Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Simone, please review the revised proposal:
>> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-206
>>
>> For anyone else who voted previously you may wish to double check your
>> response.
>> --
>> Jody Garnett
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 at 17:46, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the clarification Simone, I will update the proposal
>>> accordingly.
>>> --
>>> Jody Garnett
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 at 13:06, Simone Giannecchini <
>>> simone.giannecch...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "or any variation over this" means that you can propose something
>>>> different from what I propose as long as it does not involve GPKG formats
>>>> for WMS and WFS to end up in core right away.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Simone Giannecchini
>>>> ==
>>>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
>>>> Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services for more information.
>>>> ==
>>>> Ing. Simone Giannecchini
>>>> @simogeo
>>>> Founder/Director GeoSolutions Italy
>>>> President GeoSolutions USA
>>>>
>>>> phone: +39 0584 962313
>>>> fax:     +39 0584 1660272
>>>> mob:   +39  333 8128928
>>>>
>>>> http://www.geosolutionsgroup.com
>>>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
>>>> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
>>>> otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by
>>>> European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this
>>>> e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended
>>>> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please
>>>> notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 9:50 PM Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I am not sure I understand your statement "or any variation over this"
>>>>> - what do you mean?
>>>>>
>>>>> I am presently trying to make sure I understand your feedback here,
>>>>> and testing fixes for geopackage axis order (GEOS-8793,GEOT-7011).
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jody Garnett
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 at 11:57, Simone Giannecchini <
>>>>> simone.giannecch...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Jody,
>>>>>> no my proposal is:
>>>>>> - GPKG output for WMS and WFS becomes an official extension
>>>>>> - GPKG output for WPS gets folded in WPS
>>>>>>  or any variation over this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am not confident in having GPKG output for WMS and FS jump directly
>>>>>> into core but we shall try to find a middle ground to not block your 
>>>>>> work.
>>>>>> Feel free to propose something else along these lines.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Simone Giannecchini
>>>>>> ==
>>>>>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
>>>>>> Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services for more information.
>>>>>> ==
>>>>>> Ing. Simone Giannecchini
>>>>>> @simogeo
>>>>>> Founder/Director GeoSolutions Italy
>>>>>> President GeoSolutions USA
>>>>>>
>>>>>> phone: +39 0584 962313
>>>>>> fax:     +39 0584 1660272
>>>>>> mob:   +39  333 8128928
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.geosolutionsgroup.com
>>>>>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
>>>>>> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
>>>>>> otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by
>>>>>> European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of 
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended
>>>>>> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, 
>>>>>> please
>>>>>> notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 3:29 PM Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Simone
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So the counter proposal is to take WFS and WMS into their own (very
>>>>>>> small) extensions, and leave WPS functionality behind as a community
>>>>>>> module. I am aware that the wps download extension offers very simple
>>>>>>> geopackage output for a single layer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will need to check if that is okay.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jody
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 1:37 AM Simone Giannecchini <
>>>>>>> simone.giannecch...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Jody,
>>>>>>>> I second what Andrea said, I'd be much more confident if we
>>>>>>>> followed the usual path and we made the gpkg output for WMS and WFS as 
>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>> official extension.
>>>>>>>> In time we can move it to core but at the moment I still don't feel
>>>>>>>> like these modules are ready.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Let me know what you think.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Simone Giannecchini
>>>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
>>>>>>>> Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services for more information.
>>>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>>> Ing. Simone Giannecchini
>>>>>>>> @simogeo
>>>>>>>> Founder/Director GeoSolutions Italy
>>>>>>>> President GeoSolutions USA
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> phone: +39 0584 962313
>>>>>>>> fax:     +39 0584 1660272
>>>>>>>> mob:   +39  333 8128928
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.geosolutionsgroup.com
>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
>>>>>>>> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential 
>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>> otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by
>>>>>>>> European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of 
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended
>>>>>>>> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, 
>>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>>> notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:49 AM Andrea Aime <
>>>>>>>> andrea.a...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Jody,
>>>>>>>>> the checklist should be part of the proposal ;-)
>>>>>>>>> Maybe Simone's worries can be addressed by just upgrading the
>>>>>>>>> module as an extension, instead of splitting it and folding it into 
>>>>>>>>> core
>>>>>>>>> modules?
>>>>>>>>> The gs-wms and gs-wfs have somehow limited usage anyways, can only
>>>>>>>>> be used to make small exports that would not trigger an HTTP timeout
>>>>>>>>> (I have seen 1 to 5 minutes timeouts in pratical deploys).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>> Andrea
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 3:16 AM Jody Garnett <
>>>>>>>>> jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Simone, this is the definition of slow moving and not urgent. I
>>>>>>>>>> first asked if this was a good idea around 2 years ago as a customer 
>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> interested. Procurement moves slowly, funding has now come through 
>>>>>>>>>> to do
>>>>>>>>>> this activity. The customer has been using geopackage WFS output for 
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> least three years. Indeed this funding is as a result of a review of 
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> community modules the customer is using in production, and asking if 
>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>> would be interested in helping it be cleaned up and made into an 
>>>>>>>>>> official
>>>>>>>>>> extension.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> While I do not have a sizable number of clients, once this
>>>>>>>>>> functionality has been cleaned up I will be adding it to the geocat
>>>>>>>>>> enterprise products for all our customers (presently it is an option 
>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>> request).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Let's review the checklist:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *1. The module has at least a “handful” of users.*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have three users of this functionality, only one I would
>>>>>>>>>> consider as using it in production.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *2. The module has a designated and active maintainer*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I offered to join Andrea on this (on the assumption the
>>>>>>>>>> functionality can be cleaned up and be included in geocat enterprise
>>>>>>>>>> products).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *3. The module is considered “stable” by the majority of the PSC*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I checked in with this on november/decemeber expecting wfs and
>>>>>>>>>> wps to be stable and wms output format to be removed. Andrea asked 
>>>>>>>>>> me to
>>>>>>>>>> revise the proposal to include gs-wms.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So far my personal testing has been mixed, EPSG:4326 output is
>>>>>>>>>> coming out in Y/X order which does not match up with the 
>>>>>>>>>> specification:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The axis order in WKB stored in a GeoPackage follows the de facto
>>>>>>>>>> standard for axis order in WKB and is therefore always (x,y{,z}{,m}) 
>>>>>>>>>> where
>>>>>>>>>> x is easting or longitude, y is northing or latitude, z is optional
>>>>>>>>>> elevation, and m is optional measure. This ordering explicitly 
>>>>>>>>>> overrides
>>>>>>>>>> the axis order as specified in the SRS metadata, applying Case 4 
>>>>>>>>>> from OGC
>>>>>>>>>> 08-038r7, Revision to Axis Order Policy and Recommendations[K11]. 
>>>>>>>>>> This was
>>>>>>>>>> done to maintain consistency with previous implementations of WKB 
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> predated the OGC policy.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The above indicates additional QA is needed. You can also see the
>>>>>>>>>> proposal where I noted frustration with a couple design decisions.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *4. The module maintains 40% test coverage*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The coverage looks good, but I have not measured it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *5. The module has no IP violations.*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So far everything seems to be original work, with links to OGC
>>>>>>>>>> where appropriate. If something comes up during the activity I will 
>>>>>>>>>> let you
>>>>>>>>>> know.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *6. The module has a page in the user manual*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Not directly useful as the documentation will be distributed
>>>>>>>>>> across several pages:
>>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.geoserver.org/stable/en/user/community/geopkg/index.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I also note geosolutions has training materials
>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.geoserver.geo-solutions.it/edu/en/wps/geopackage_output.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *7. The maintainer has signed the GeoServer Contributor Agreement*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> OSGeo has a signed CLA from both myself and GeoCat BV.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Jody Garnett
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 at 14:23, Simone Giannecchini <
>>>>>>>>>> simone.giannecch...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Good Morning Jody,
>>>>>>>>>>> I am not too inclined on having the gpkg output jump from
>>>>>>>>>>> community to core for WMS and WFS.
>>>>>>>>>>> The process we have in place is there to exactly  prevent
>>>>>>>>>>> something like this from happening because "someone needs it 
>>>>>>>>>>> urgently".
>>>>>>>>>>> I mean, have you been using them in production enough to be
>>>>>>>>>>> confident with them? Do you already have a sizable number of 
>>>>>>>>>>> clients using
>>>>>>>>>>> the extensions so we can trust them? I guess not given what you said
>>>>>>>>>>> above...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> For the moment my vote is a -1 on this, but I am happy to hear
>>>>>>>>>>> your thoughts on my points above.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Simone Giannecchini
>>>>>>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>>>>>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
>>>>>>>>>>> Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services for more information.
>>>>>>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>>>>>> Ing. Simone Giannecchini
>>>>>>>>>>> @simogeo
>>>>>>>>>>> Founder/Director GeoSolutions Italy
>>>>>>>>>>> President GeoSolutions USA
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> phone: +39 0584 962313
>>>>>>>>>>> fax:     +39 0584 1660272
>>>>>>>>>>> mob:   +39  333 8128928
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.geosolutionsgroup.com
>>>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it
>>>>>>>>>>> is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, 
>>>>>>>>>>> confidential
>>>>>>>>>>> or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as 
>>>>>>>>>>> provided by
>>>>>>>>>>> European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use 
>>>>>>>>>>> of this
>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended
>>>>>>>>>>> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by 
>>>>>>>>>>> mistake, please
>>>>>>>>>>> notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 1:50 AM Jody Garnett <
>>>>>>>>>>> jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Proposal is renamed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> With respect to gs-wps module I would like to see the matching
>>>>>>>>>>>> gt-wps unsupported module which forms its foundation cleaned up 
>>>>>>>>>>>> (finally).
>>>>>>>>>>>> Something we can discuss in the new year.
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jody Garnett
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 at 07:40, Jody Garnett <
>>>>>>>>>>>> jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Andrea, I will rename the proposal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have capacity to support the wps module on this one (as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> indeed a customer is funding this activity).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jody
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 5:11 AM Andrea Aime <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> andrea.a...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jody,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking the proposal, I believe the title is misleading, it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seems to suggest a classic module move from community to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extension, as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is... which does not match the actual proposal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The actual proposal is:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - Fold the WFS output format gs-wfs, the WMS output
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    format in gs-wms, hence, move these two bits in _core_
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - Fold the WPS process in gs-wps-core
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> About the move to cover of the WMS/WFS output formats, from a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> technical point of view I'm not concerned:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - The WFS output format will eventually break for large
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    outputs due to HTTP  time outs (needs to be written on disk 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first, streamed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    back once complete), but the same already happens for zipped 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shapefiles, so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    nothing really new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - The WMS output format now honors the rendering time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    outs, so it should be fine
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I should however point out that the core of GeoServer is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "maintained by the PSC" so the rest of the PSC should be 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comfortable having
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that code in core, and realize the associated obligation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> About the move of the WPS process to wps-core, I'm also
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personally not deeply concerned, if the documentation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is very clear about the experimental extensions baked into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the process (so doc updates are needed).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm however noting the code moving also moves
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its maintainership from "nobody" to me (the WPS module 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maintainer), which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not too fond of [1].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since you're making the proposal, I'd like you to step up as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> co-maintainer of the code you're trying to push up. For the core 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bits, as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PSC member, you're taking that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> responsibility automatically anyways. Please step up to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> co-maintain the processes once moved in gs-wps-core.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] Due to both project and business obligations I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> responsible for way too many modules already,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something which is too big of a onus on my shoulders, and a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> big project liability in case I get sick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or decide to leave. It's something we'll have to address,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possibly sooner rather than later.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 5:28 AM Jody Garnett <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please have a look at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-206 which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outlines moving different sections of the geopackage community 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> module into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the appropriate core module: gs-wfs, gs-wms, and gs-wps.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The proposal is solid, please make note of the backwards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compatibility section which proposes calling out wps geopackage 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supports
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for not yet finalized extensions. While there is nothing wrong 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with having
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> geoserver specific extensions they should be documented as such 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and marked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as in progress if they are chasing a moving target).  If folks 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strongly about documentation not being enough warning I can 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look at leaving
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these geopackage extensions as an optional install.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jody
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jody Garnett
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Geoserver-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea Aime
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services-us for more information.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ing. Andrea Aime
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @geowolf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Technical Lead
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GeoSolutions Group
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phone: +39 0584 962313
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fax:     +39 0584 1660272
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mob:   +39  333 8128928
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protezione dei
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> presente email
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scrivente.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cancellarlo, ogni
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> darmene
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> notizia.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that - as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provided by European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dissemination or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jody Garnett
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> Geoserver-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Andrea Aime
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>>>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services-us for more information.
>>>>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ing. Andrea Aime
>>>>>>>>> @geowolf
>>>>>>>>> Technical Lead
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> GeoSolutions Group
>>>>>>>>> phone: +39 0584 962313
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> fax:     +39 0584 1660272
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> mob:   +39  333 8128928
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali
>>>>>>>>> (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati 
>>>>>>>>> “GDPR”),
>>>>>>>>> si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo
>>>>>>>>> contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è
>>>>>>>>> riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il
>>>>>>>>> messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra
>>>>>>>>> operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene 
>>>>>>>>> notizia.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it
>>>>>>>>> is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, 
>>>>>>>>> confidential
>>>>>>>>> or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided 
>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>> European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use 
>>>>>>>>> of this
>>>>>>>>> e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended
>>>>>>>>> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, 
>>>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>>>> notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Jody Garnett
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to