Thanks Andrea,
I switched to to GML and got it working:
https://gist.github.com/mbertrand/ac76e0994f8623d687dc#file-inclusion_gml_3857_working-xml
<https://gist.github.com/mbertrand/ac76e0994f8623d687dc#file-inclusion_gml_3857_working-xml>
Oddly if both inputs are GeoJSON then it works:
https://gist.github.com/mbertrand/ac76e0994f8623d687dc#file-inclusion_two_json_working-xml
<https://gist.github.com/mbertrand/ac76e0994f8623d687dc#file-inclusion_two_json_working-xml>
-Matt
> On Jan 21, 2016, at 5:49 PM, Andrea Aime <andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> it makes me wonder if there is a problem with the geojson parsing... did you
> try with gml instead?
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Matt Bertrand <m...@epidemico.com
> <mailto:m...@epidemico.com>> wrote:
> Hi everyone, I'm having trouble with the WPS gs:InclusionFeatureCollection
> process when using a layer as the first input and a geojson feature
> collection as the second input:
>
> Request:
> https://gist.github.com/mbertrand/ac76e0994f8623d687dc#file-broken_inclusion_by_layer_vectorbuffer-xml
>
> <https://gist.github.com/mbertrand/ac76e0994f8623d687dc#file-broken_inclusion_by_layer_vectorbuffer-xml>
> Response:
> {
> "type": "FeatureCollection",
> "features": []
> }
>
> Zero features are returned, but that is incorrect.
>
> When using two vector layers as inputs (via a chained response, buffering one
> feature from a vector layer), the correct features are returned:
>
> Request:
> https://gist.github.com/mbertrand/ac76e0994f8623d687dc#file-working_inclusion_by_vectorlayer-xml
>
> <https://gist.github.com/mbertrand/ac76e0994f8623d687dc#file-working_inclusion_by_vectorlayer-xml>
> Response:
> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/mbertrand/ac76e0994f8623d687dc/raw/50c53ccadcc5aa6117e4a85ec5ba196f5fbed4f5/working_inclusion_by_vectorlayer_result.json
>
> <https://gist.githubusercontent.com/mbertrand/ac76e0994f8623d687dc/raw/50c53ccadcc5aa6117e4a85ec5ba196f5fbed4f5/working_inclusion_by_vectorlayer_result.json>
>
> However, I need to create buffers around user-defined lines rather than
> existing layer features, which rules out the working option. I'm wondering
> if there's something off with my request XML in the first example above or if
> this is a Geoserver bug? I've also tried "vec:InclusionFeatureCollection"
> with the same results. I'm using Geoserver 2.7.4
>
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> <http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140>
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-users mailing list
> Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> <mailto:Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users>
>
>
>
> --
> ==
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
> http://goo.gl/it488V <http://goo.gl/it488V> for more information.
> ==
>
> Ing. Andrea Aime
> @geowolf
> Technical Lead
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
> 55054 Massarosa (LU)
> Italy
> phone: +39 0584 962313
> fax: +39 0584 1660272
> mob: +39 339 8844549
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it <http://www.geo-solutions.it/>
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it <http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it>
>
> AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003
>
> Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i
> file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro
> utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le
> finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio
> senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia
> via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso,
> cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo
> anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per
> finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal
> D.Lgs. 196/2003.
>
>
> The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
> the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
> proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
> (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
> Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
> copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
> strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named addressee(s).
> If you are not the intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender
> by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message that
> has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty or accept
> liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent messages and
> accepts no responsibility for changes made after they were sent or for other
> risks which arise as a result of e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
