Hello everyone,

We are running a Geoserver instance with Postgres/PostGIS backend. Everything 
seems to work fine so far, except for WFS with GML.

We have two specific issues here:

1) The auto-generated feature IDs (see [1]) do not comply with the QName 
convention. We use UUIDs to identify our datasets and Geoserver seems to uses 
this UUID directly to generate Feature IDs. Since QNames must not start with a 
number, we get invalid GML for roughly 10 out of 16 datasets. Most 
Validators/Clients we have tested fail to parse this GML (QGIS among them).

2) Geoserver uses Postgres column names as feature attribute names. Since 
Postgres column names are not restricted to QNames (e.g. "12345", "km/s" are 
valid column names), we sometimes run into similar issues here.

Is this intended behavior, i.e. is the dataset provider responsible for 
ensuring QName compliant attribute names, or is it a bug?


Kind regards,
Matthias

p.s.: Geoserver version is 2.8.3

[1]:

<gml:featureMember>
        <ckandev:402b28fe-af35-463f-a78f-47f121cea236
                fid="402b28fe-af35-463f-a78f-47f121cea236.1">
                <ckandev:X>51.003874</ckandev:X>
                <ckandev:Y>13.726043</ckandev:Y>
                <ckandev:Timestamp>2012-07-20T:10:00GMT+1</ckandev:Timestamp>
                <ckandev:Place>Bannewitz</ckandev:Place>
                
<ckandev:Zn_1000_-_400___micro_g_per_g_>127.3936706</ckandev:Zn_1000_-_400___micro_g_per_g_>
                
<ckandev:Zn_400_-_100___micro_g_per_g_>418.9342066</ckandev:Zn_400_-_100___micro_g_per_g_>
                
<ckandev:Zn_100_-_63___micro_g_per_g_>743.5718278</ckandev:Zn_100_-_63___micro_g_per_g_>
                
<ckandev:Zn_63_-_0.45___micro_g_per_g_>528.2146161</ckandev:Zn_63_-_0.45___micro_g_per_g_>
                
<ckandev:Zn_SUMM___micro_g_per_g_>377.8245751</ckandev:Zn_SUMM___micro_g_per_g_>
                
<ckandev:Cu_1000_-_400___micro_g_per_g_>48.0749849</ckandev:Cu_1000_-_400___micro_g_per_g_>
                
<ckandev:Cu_400_-_100___micro_g_per_g_>112.1762429</ckandev:Cu_400_-_100___micro_g_per_g_>
                
<ckandev:Cu_100_-_63___micro_g_per_g_>164.8965903</ckandev:Cu_100_-_63___micro_g_per_g_>
                
<ckandev:Cu_63_-_0.45___micro_g_per_g_>151.0506145</ckandev:Cu_63_-_0.45___micro_g_per_g_>
                
<ckandev:Cu_SUMM___micro_g_per_g_>105.0860617</ckandev:Cu_SUMM___micro_g_per_g_>
                
<ckandev:Cd_1000_-_400___micro_g_per_g_>0.056641806</ckandev:Cd_1000_-_400___micro_g_per_g_>
                
<ckandev:Cd_400_-_100___micro_g_per_g_>0.166999107</ckandev:Cd_400_-_100___micro_g_per_g_>
                
<ckandev:Cd_100_-_63___micro_g_per_g_>0.264253773</ckandev:Cd_100_-_63___micro_g_per_g_>
                
<ckandev:Cd_63_-_0.45___micro_g_per_g_>0.278181578</ckandev:Cd_63_-_0.45___micro_g_per_g_>
                
<ckandev:Cd_SUMM___micro_g_per_g_>0.1663264</ckandev:Cd_SUMM___micro_g_per_g_>
                <ckandev:Shape>
                        <gml:Point 
srsName="http://www.opengis.net/gml/srs/epsg.xml#4326";>
                                <gml:coordinates 
xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml";
                                        decimal="." cs="," ts=" 
">13.726043,51.003874</gml:coordinates>
                        </gml:Point>
                </ckandev:Shape>
        </ckandev:402b28fe-af35-463f-a78f-47f121cea236>
</gml:featureMember>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are 
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, 
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning
reports. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=1444514421&iu=/41014381
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Reply via email to