Our customers are demanding to support the latest version of log4j in 
Geoserver, I mean the latest 2.* without vulnerabilities because log4j 1.* is 
EOL.On the Geoserver website I found this (13-12-2021):
We are also aware that Log4J 1.2.17 is an “End Of Life” (EOL) project, and are 
actively looking for funding to perform an upgrade to more recent versions of 
them. All new logging libraries have a different API and a different 
configuration file layout, with potential backwards compatibility issues, so 
this will be likely done on newer versions of GeoServer (2.21.x).

What is the status at this moment?
Thanks,Ron    On Monday, 20 December 2021, 11:38:54 CET, Mark Prins 
<mc.pr...@gmail.com> wrote:  
 
 On 19-12-2021 11:11, Michael Steigemann via Geoserver-users wrote:
> Hello!
> Thank you very much for providing the geoserver.war: 
> log4j-1.2.17.norce.jar.
> I have integrated into geoserver and ran a OWASP dependency check ( 
> https://jeremylong.github.io/DependencyCheck/dependency-check-cli/index.html 
> <https://jeremylong.github.io/DependencyCheck/dependency-check-cli/index.html>)
> 
> The library is still classified as critical:
> geoserver.war: log4j-1.2.17.norce.jar 
> cpe:2.3:a:apache:log4j:1.2.17:*:*:*:*:*:*:* 
> pkg:maven/log4j/log4j@1.2.17-norce    CRITICAL    2    Highest    27
> 
> Do you think it is possible and a good idea to register the library as 
> "safe" in the central database?

No, this is not a new release but the same release with some files 
removed and a way of preventing people from shooting themselves in the 
foot because they can no longer configure the culprit appenders.

After inspection of the new jar file you can add a suppression for false 
positives like

<suppress>
    <notes>
        <![CDATA[

                  CVE-2019-17571 log4j Socket Server
                  CVE-2020-9488 log4j SMTP appender
                  CVE-2021-4104 log4j JMSAppender
        ]]>
    </notes>
    <gav regex="true">^log4j:log4j:1\.2\.17$</gav>
    <cve>CVE-2019-17571</cve>
    <cve>CVE-2020-9488</cve>
    <cve>CVE-2021-4104</cve>
</suppress>




_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list

Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this 
list:
- Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: 
http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
- The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: 
http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html

If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: 
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer


Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
  
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list

Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this 
list:
- Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: 
http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
- The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: 
http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html

If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: 
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer


Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Reply via email to