Martin: Signing the GT Libs is not necessary. I think in most cases it would be better to have the applet under the one signature of the client app. Since it only has to be done once it's not a big time sink during the development process.
AP -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Desruisseaux Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 5:40 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Geotools-gt2-users] Security problem with geotools in an applet Parks, Aaron B. a écrit : > I was doing something similar and had to sign the various geotools > Jars that accessed stuff on the HD. Specifically: > > myApplet.jar > Gt2-shapefile.jar > Gt2-main.jar Should we sign Geotools JAR as part of the build process (I mean, can it be a cause of trouble for some applications?). I can add this step to the Maven 2 build if desired (but not in Maven 1 build). However, it may take a few weeks before the Maven 2 build is fully functional. Martin. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information _______________________________________________ Geotools-gt2-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
