On 8/23/06, Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well Corey is driving for two reason:
> 1) he understands now the maven deploy build lifecycle stuff
> 2) he reviewed GeoAPI 2.0 against the SLD 1.0 specification, and has
> volunteered to updated the interfaces for GeoAPI 2.1.
>
> Justin currently GeoTools is method name compatible for the
> FeatureTypeStyle and friends, problem is those method names come from
> SLD 1.0.20 (a spec that was never published). So if you are going to go
> through and do the deprecation game we need to ....

> 0) ask what is happening with SLD 1.1 (four years and counting)
Check out discussion papers 05-077 (Symbology Encoding Implementation
Specification) and 05-078 (Styled Layer Descriptor Profile of the Web
Map Service Implementation Specification) from
http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/dp. I'd link to the documents
but OGC seems to require a click through licience now :-(

If there are things in these docs we don't like now would be a good
time to find out before it becomes a complete specification.

Ian

-- 

Ian Turton
http://www.geotools.org
http://pennspace.blogspot.com/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to