Olaf Danne ha scritto:
> Hello,
> 
> we would like to briefly introduce ourselves as a developing group who 
> has been started to investigate and test Geotools for the use within 
> specific applications which we are currently developing. If we decide to 
> use it (we strongly think to do so), we will also have to contribute 
> directly and to supply new code to Geotools in future.

Now that's good news, welcome on board (really hope you can choose
geotools for good) :-)

> We are a company working basically on environmental informatics and 
> geodata processing, and we have two applications for which Geotools is a 
> strong candidate to be used within. The first one, which I am involved 
> in, is a desktop application to display satellite orbits and 
> corresponding swaths of instruments onboard these satellites. 

Have you evaluated uDig in this respect?

> The 
> display will basically be a visualization of the orbits/swaths on a 
> world map, but shall be highly configurable in detail. E.g., we will 
> have to:
> 
>     - display additional layers  (e.g., a grid, country borders, cities, 
> selected zones, a background image) on demand
>     - supply mechanisms to zoom, rotate, shift, and to select specific 
> sections of the map
>     - show the map under different projections

This is something we do support already, uDig can do almost all of them,
besides map rotation, but I think this is just a lack of user interface
for it (renderers to accept an affine transform as a parameter).

> The last point is important regarding our potential contribution to 
> Geotools. Besides a "standard" rectangular cylindric projection, we will 
> need at least an AzimuthalEquidistant and a Gnomonic projection which 
> are obviously not yet supplied by Geotools (package org 
> <javascript:searchRef('org')>.geotools 
> <javascript:searchRef('geotools')>.referencing 
> <javascript:searchRef('referencing')>.operation 
> <javascript:searchRef('operation')>.projection). 
> <javascript:searchRef('projection')> Therefore, we will have to go and 
> add these projections following your tutorial 
> (http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/How+to+add+new+projections). 
> - You may also regard this email as "step 0" of that tutorial ;-)

Martin is our resident projection expert, I think he'll be happy to have
two new projections around :-)

> Questions we may have in future will regard these projection topics, but 
> also the rendering and performance issues, which are also very important 
> for us.

uDig has a tentative multi-threaded rendering architecture. Geoserver
does use a plain sequential one. Some more research in this topic is 
needed, but I'm personally very interested in the topic.

I hope we can have a fruitful collaboration
Cheers
Andrea Aime

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to