Thanks Gabriel; my earlier comment was one of surprise (the 
functionality you described was working in Novemeber - I have been 
remiss in letting a patch break it, or not capturing the functionality 
in test cases)

That said - did you provide a test case for this functionality in main?
Jody
> On Wednesday 07 February 2007 11:25, Andrea Aime wrote:
>   
>> Gabriel Roldán ha scritto:
>>     
>>> On Tuesday 06 February 2007 23:28, Jody Garnett wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> I see a couple of issues with this approach. And I know that I have
>>>>> voiced these before but I cant turn down the opportunity to do it
>>>>> again :)
>>>>>           
>>>> That said I am glad to see the code appearing in an unsupported module
>>>> (and used to test our Filter implementation) these are the first steps
>>>> after all.
>>>>         
>>> That means its ok to _fix_ the Filter issue provided that no additional
>>> burden is added (no reference to the new model, just letting
>>> evaluate(Object) being called after all)?
>>>       
>> Gabriel, go for it please.
>> If Jody did not want you to work on it, he should have said it directly.
>>     
>
> ok, so I went ahead and fixed it. Also made FidFilter.evaluate(Object) to use 
> PropertyAccessor.get(object, "@id") to abstract it out from the type of 
> object being evaluated.
>
> Gabriel
>   
>> Cheers
>> Andrea
>>     
>
>   


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to