Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Andrea Aime wrote: >> I think we're down to the road of deep paths damnation, but lets >> experience disprove me :-) > Andrea we are in close agreement; we both don't want to see a huge > dependency - and would like something more fine grained. I do not want > to see > many little jars - especially when some of the specifications slot > together. > > xml compatibility pack 1: > - filter1_0, gml2, jts > > xml compatibility pack 2: > - filter1_1, gml3, geometry.wkt > > Would you consider that kind of thing sane?
Apple and oranges? What xml parsers have to do with geometry wkt parsers? Oh,you're missing sld too, we have two of them (parsers). Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
