Adrian Custer wrote:
> (1) Why drop all of unsupported? Will it not be possible to isolate
> those parts of unsupported that don't compile or have internal changes
> broken everything?

Regarding unsupported: only javadocs were dropped for this group.  I did 
this to keep the release going out in a timely fashion -- if something 
doesn't work on release day, we shouldn't waste time trying to fix it 
unless it is *really* important.  I could have taken a little extra time 
to isolate the broken javadocs, but instead took the fast track (who 
needs unsupported javadocs anyhow).

It's *great* that we have a release process that takes only a couple hours.

The fact that something got cut is an alarm bell.  I know that the 
geometry module in unsupported does not have functioning javadocs; 
other unsupported modules may be broken as well -- we should check each 
of the modules in unsupported to ensure that javadocs actually build.

Another question to consider is if we ever want to build javadocs for 
unsupported?

> (2) why release an alpha milestone to users? I can see the need for core
> developers to test their build for the new release but I don't see the
> reason to expose this to users. I really don't want to handle the slew
> of messages: "where's my mappane?" so I would suggest *not* mentioning
> these on the user list until we get to the lockdown for release (e.g.
> release candidates).

Fair enough... i'm indifferent on this one.  We could stick to the devel 
list -- it would mean one less e-mail during the whole process :)

Cheers,
Cory.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to