Hi Stefan reading this email a bit more carefully (and seeing you CCed our old budCameron) I am going to guess you want to set up an unsupported module (please correct me if I am wrong! it would be rude of me to make off with Lisasoft developers if you are only offering us the code).
The long and short of it is we are happy to have your code; but we would be happier to have you as a developer. The developer guide has the gory details on how this all works. Specifcally for a new module: - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/Creating+your+own+Module The instructions are so easy you are already on step 2. Welcome to GeoTools, Jody Stefan Hansen wrote: > Hi all! > > We have implemented a datastore, which is supposed to be used in > Geoserver to aggregate the responses from several other WFS. > > Our datastore uses the WFS-datastore to communicate with the cascaded > WFS (therefore, it is restricted to WFS 1.0). From the WFS-datastores > it retrieves responses and aggregates them into one response, which is > then passed on. > > So far the aggregation part of the datastore is rather limited. Apart > from making sure the features match the common schema (ie. removing > attributes that are not part of the schema and mapping the > FeatureTypeName if necessary), they are passed on without being > changed. > > The FeatureTypes provided by the datastore are defined in a > config-file as well as the configuration of the cascaded WFS. The > configuration of the WFS contains at the moment the URL to the WFS, > the supported FeatureTypes and the mapping of the FeatureTypeNames > (This is for example necessary, if other Geoservers are cascaded). > > The project is still in an early stage. We think, we implemented most > of the required functionality, but so far we haven't had the > opportunity to do run too many tests. > > However, if you, the Geotools community, are interested, we are happy > to contribute our datastore. It would be also great to get some > feedback on the code from people who know more about > Geotools/Geoserver than we do. > > So if anyone is interested in our datastore and wants to see it, > please let me know. What would actually be the next steps we have to > do, so our datastore can become an unsupported module or something > like that? > > cheers, > stefan > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
