Andrea Aime wrote: > Validation? Warnings? Sorry? > I thought that was what you were wanting; apparently i was wrong. > A filter like "INCLUDE and INCLUDE and EXCLUDE" is perfectly valid, > it's just redundant. I was speaking about simplification, not validation. > Okay for simplification I would like to see that handled as a filter visitor; ie I don't want magic to occur when you start trying to use a factory. > Moreover, a wrapper cannot change the fact ff.and(...) must return and > And filter, whilst a smart builder would have to return Filter, generically. > I understand the limitation. > I don't know about fallbacks and stuff, but remember, we have a very > extensive code base and adding the builder everywhere is going to > have quite a cost (the old filter migration, still unfinished, should > have teached us something...) > Not having factories do magic was one of the things it taught us. Jody
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
