Okay I will give that a go .... after removing velocity I have:
> Used undeclared dependencies found:
> org.geotools:gt-api:jar:2.6-SNAPSHOT:compile
> org.opengis:geoapi:jar:2.2-SNAPSHOT:compile
> com.vividsolutions:jts:jar:1.9:compile
> org.geotools:gt-metadata:jar:2.6-SNAPSHOT:compile
> Unused declared dependencies found:
> javax.media:jai_core:jar:1.1.3:provided
> org.geotools:gt-epsg-hsql:jar:2.6-SNAPSHOT:test
Removing velocity from the pom.xml on trunk; I am not working on 2.5.x
at work ... hopefully another developer can pick up the change.
Another comment here - I find the tutorials listing the version number
again and again to be a bit of a pain; would adding the following at the
top of the first project example be okay for people?
> <properties>
> <geotools.version>2.5-RC2</geotools.version>
> </properties>
And then we could do things like:
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.geotools</groupId>
> <artifactId>gt-shapefile</artifactId>
> <version>${geotools.version}</version>
> </dependency>
Or would it just limit everyones ability to cut and paste dependencies
into their existing projects....
Jody
Michael Bedward wrote:
> I've found mvn dependency:analyze very helpful for this sort of question
>
> Michael
>
> 2008/9/9 Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Matthias Basler wrote:
>>
>>> However I seem unable to find where this dependency is actually used (I
>>> searched the source files for "velocity" both in Explorer and in Eclipse)
>>> and didn't find a single match.) Also the code example given runs smoothly
>>> without this dependency.
>>>
>>>
>> Interesting; we should be able to drop it then. I am not sure where/why
>> velocity was used (perhaps it is left over from when velocity was needed
>> in order to run maven?).
>>
>>> So: Is velocity actually required to read and/or write shapefiles? If not,
>>> can the dependency be removed or is there another specific reason it is
>>> declared?
>>>
>>>
>> For a while jdom was used to parse shape metdata (ie shape.shp.xml)
>> files; that is my only guess ... but jdom is low level enough that it
>> would not use velocity.
>>
>> I am betting this is just a case of neglect from the maven 1.0 transition.
>> Jody
>>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
