Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Good point about unsupported/jdbc - we do not want to change the > module name. We should leave the implementations that are not ready > yet where they are. > > Slightly off topic (I saw Andrea mention this on the user emaillist). > One of the tasks associated with moving a module to supported is > running it though the QA star program; which involves setting up a > module matrix page. It appears as though Andrea has managed to produce > a maven site on his own - and is just waiting for deployment > instructions. Is there any chance we can replace the module matrix > page with maven site documentation? Even as just a documentation > convention...
Would be very nice. We can use a .apt file to store the 5 stars report. The wiki is not exactly kept up to date ;-) Site wise I was waiting to see if OpenGeo had the extra power to generate the site nightly and we also had issues on how and where to deploy it (would be nice if it was deployed over to geotools.org at OSGEO). Christian also suggested he could generate the site with his Hudson, but afaik that is still a month away. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
