> trunk release?

When we eventually release a 2.7-M1 or something.

> Can you please clarify? I would suggest to do this asap, it does not
> look like it can represent a big impediment for patches to me.

So the other alternative (in order to easily apply patches to both)
would be to perform the move to 2.6.x and trunk.

Jody

> Simone.
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Ing. Simone Giannecchini
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Founder - Software Engineer
> Via Carignoni 51
> 55041  Camaiore (LU)
> Italy
>
> phone: +39 0584983027
> fax:      +39 0584983027
> mob:    +39 333 8128928
>
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/simonegiannecchini
> http://twitter.com/simogeo
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Could we put this off until right before an actual trunk release? Or we may 
>> wish to do this for both 2.6.x and trunk in one go (in order to have an 
>> easier time applying patches).
>>
>> There seems to be agreement on the email list here that it is a worthwhile 
>> change. Should probably still make a proposal.
>>
>> Jody
>>
>> On 20/03/2010, at 4:51 AM, Simone Giannecchini wrote:
>>
>>> now, should we request a formal proposal to investigate this better or
>>> do you suggest a more agile apporach?
>>> I am assuming anyway, that whatever we will do, will happen on trunk.
>>>
>>> Simone.
>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>> Ing. Simone Giannecchini
>>> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
>>> Founder - Software Engineer
>>> Via Carignoni 51
>>> 55041  Camaiore (LU)
>>> Italy
>>>
>>> phone: +39 0584983027
>>> fax:      +39 0584983027
>>> mob:    +39 333 8128928
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.geo-solutions.it
>>> http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/simonegiannecchini
>>> http://twitter.com/simogeo
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Michael Bedward
>>> <michael.bedw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 20 March 2010 00:01, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>>>>> +1 to this idea. There is definitely need of an incubator space since
>>>>> they should really be treated differently from unsupported. I would be
>>>>> happy leaving unsupported as is but adding an incubator section for new
>>>>> modules and experimentation.
>>>>
>>>> I quite like this idea too and I think users would find it easier to work 
>>>> with.
>>>>
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
>>>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
>>>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
>>>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Geotools-devel mailing list
>>>> Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
>>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
>>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
>>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Geotools-devel mailing list
>>> Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geotools-devel mailing list
>> Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to