Christian Müller ha scritto: > Yep, sounds good using {bbox} > At the moment I have the problem with tons of views in my database. The > virtual table concept could be a solution for this. If you like I would try > to deploy virtual tables in Geoserver 2.x > Is there anything preventing the patch to be applied to gt-2.6.x ?. > Is there anything preventing virtual tables to work with geoserver 2.x ? > Otherwise I would try a "real world" deployment.
I did not try to apply on 2.6.x, but I don't see any reason why they should not work. Mind that you'd be playing with a preliminary version, that the {bbox} optimization is still to be made, and that I'd still like to remove the views factory parameter in favor of programmatic configuration + storing the view definition as a FeatureTypeInfo metadata in GeoServer. I'm also very hesitant on the idea of adding this functionality to GeoServer 2.0.x, it would be better to add the set of changes needed only to trunk imho Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel