On 30/05/2010, at 10:31 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:

> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> I have added my +1 to the page.
>> The only thing I think could be added to this proposal is to not
>> allow null to be passed in when the request has been made to use an
>> existing feature ID? (Presuming of course that wfs has the same
>> meaning and error condition).
> 
> Not allow null to be passed in... yet, afaik, it's not possible
> to build a feature whose id is null in the current code.

If you pass in null right now the factory will create a feature id for you.

> I guess a API clarification is in order in case someone uses their
> own implementation of Feature?

Yep.

Jody

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to