Yeah, the gtxml method is horrible from a IDE point of view. One thing I 
always planned to do was add shortcut classes:

GMLParser/GMLEncoder
FilterParser/FilterEncoder
etc...

On 10-05-31 12:44 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Time has come for me to tackle one of Micaheal's requests from a couple 
> months ago ... How do we parse/encode GML.
>
> To start with I have asked a few co-workers that have tried GeoTools parsing 
> lately. Mostly I got a list of ways that do not work. Interestingly they all 
> share an approach in common ...
>
> Typing in the IDE and using command completion to come up with things like:
> - GMLParsing - this is actual a demo of how to parse using GMLConfiguration
> - FeatureCollectionParser - actually part of the implementation of WFS 1.1.0
> - GML configuration for GML2 extending XSD
> - GML configuration for GML3 extending XSD
> - GML configuration for GML3.2 extending XSD
> - GML configuration for WCS extending XSD
> - GMLParsingUtils - used internally by the GML2 bindings
> - GMLFeatureCollection - returned by WFS 1.0 implementation from FCBuffer
> - etc...
>
> So the only thing I can do in these cases is improve the javadocs to point 
> people in the correct direction.
>
> Jody
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geotools-devel mailing list
> Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel


-- 
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to