Michael Bedward ha scritto:
> Hi Jody,
>
>> There are a large number of other "Collection" methods; are there any more
>> candidates
>> for removal? A couple weeks ago I mentioned the add/remove listener methods
>> as
>> something that is just not implemented.
>
> Yes, following your "prepared statement" analogy for FeatureCollection
> it doesn't make a lot of sense to have CollectionListeners, and the
> user can register a FeatureListener with the FeatureSource instead.
>
> Do the toArray methods get used much ?
>
> As an aside, I'm starting to like the "prepared statement" or "view"
> model so much that I wonder if another attempt at reform could be made
> at some stage, ie. get rid of the add / remove methods from
> FeatureCollection. Perhaps one for GeoTools 2.8 ?
/me really hates feature collections being writable. Would be +1 making
them read only right now
Cheers
Andrea
--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
