Hi,
the current gt-process module is giving me a little of a headache
in that if you want the API you get also some default processes:

org.geotools.process.literal.BufferFactory
org.geotools.process.literal.IntersectionFactory
org.geotools.process.literal.UnionFactory
org.geotools.process.literal.DoubleAdditionFactory
org.geotools.process.literal.FeatureBufferFactory
org.geotools.process.feature.BufferFeatureCollectionFactory
org.geotools.process.raster.RasterToVectorFactory
org.geotools.process.raster.VectorToRasterFactory

I understand it for demo purposes, but really, why would I want
to publish a "double addition" process out of my WPS?

I think I'll eventually need to add process blacklisting abilities
in GeoServer WPS anyways, but on the other side wouldn't it be better
to have a separation between the api and the implementation?
Module wise gt-process will eventually end up in library (if we
can make it better, or more supported) but the processes should
probably end up in thematic plugin modules (just like in Sextante?).

Cheers
Andrea

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate 
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the 
lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win: 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to