The interfaces would move to gt-api; but yes you are correct. I was hoping for a firm thumbs up when Andrea and Michael (and others) were happy with the interface before considering how best to integrate.
Jody On 08/06/2010, at 11:14 AM, Michael Bedward wrote: > Hi Andrea, Jody, > > If the processes were to be separated from the module perhaps we don't > really need the module at all ? There's not a lot to it and it could > be incorporated into main. > > I'd be happy for the vector / raster processes to live in coverage or > somewhere. > > Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
