Is it feasible to only activate it via a system property? This seems to have been the approach to backporting new features to the stable branch in the past. Although perhaps this work is too "cross cutting" to do so?
On 10-06-16 12:37 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> I think that kind of seals the deal andrea; you are the module >> maintainer. As I recall the UOM patch mostly leverages api that was >> introduced for 2.6 but did not yet function? > > Correct, there are no API changes, it's just a matter of applying > a style visitor which is btw well tested (good part of the > patch is actually made of tests) > >> Is there any api changes at all introduced by the patch? If so we >> could talk about them and see if they are significant. Only real >> danger is if the SLD parser or transformer is effected; and even then >> any changes should be additive. > > It is not affected, as far as I can see the uom were already parsed, > but ignored. > Not sure if the uom are encoded back in the transformer > tough, never checked that > > Cheers > Andrea > > > -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
