Thanks Jody. Sorry for the late reply, I only subscribe to the mailing list daily digest, so I didn't immediately get the post. There's already a GeometryPropertyTypeBinding, where it *may* have the geometry property instead of the geometry itself (like in AbstractGeometryTypeBinding), but I don't think it gets there at all. I'm investigating.
-- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/handling-of-geometry-crs-tp5300380p5310660.html Sent from the geotools-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
