Thanks, Jody. This is a decent summary of what we have, but I find it quite a confusing collection of stars and coverage thresholds. Some of these (like IP) are a must have: ticking all the other boxes would not be enough. And there are some great, solid modules that have no maintainer, but everyone keeps alive because everyone uses them.
I'll come out of the unsupported closet in another mail. On 09/05/11 16:26, Jody Garnett wrote: > Ben when I went through the wiki I found all kinds of conflicting > information; I did not make any attempt to resolve matters: > > here are some other pages: > - http://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/guide/procedures/supported.html > (mentions 60%; GeoTools 2.3 correct use of OnlineTestCase, GeoTools 2.4 30% > coverage) > - http://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/guide/procedures/check.html > - http://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/guide/procedures/create.html > - > http://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/guide/conventions/test/test.html#code-coverage-vs-regression-testing > (mentions 60%; early copies had 40% target for GeoTools 2.3) > - http://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/guide/roles/maintain.html > > If I was going to do this right; I would make a table comparing > supported/unsupported on the above page for module maintainers). It is where > we are listing responsibilities after all. > -- > Jody Garnett > > > On Monday, 9 May 2011 at 6:13 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > > On 09/05/11 16:07, Michael Bedward wrote: > On 9 May 2011 17:49, Ben > Caradoc-Davies<ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au<mailto:ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au>> > wrote: > Did the rules for module promotion make it from the wiki to the > developer guide? > Is this what you're looking for ? > http://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/guide/procedures/supported.html > > I did find that page (via a bookmarked link), but I am sure there was > another version of the page. I'm after the unit test coverage required > for a supported module: I *know* it was 40% on the old page on the wiki, > unless I wrote it down incorrectly. I'd like to check. > > -- > Ben > Caradoc-Davies<ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au<mailto:ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au>> > Software Engineering Team Leader > CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering > Australian Resources Research Centre > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software > The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network > management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial > acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution. http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
