On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Justin Deoliveira <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Emily, > I am definitely +1 on upgrading h2. One of the somewhat problematic things > is that there are a few different components around that have an h2 > dependency. It sounds like you have tested all the geotools ones. For us in > geoserver land there are some more dependencies as well.
uDig is also using h2 as the epsg storage (epsg-h2 is in unsupported land). I think GWC is also using h2 as the default metastore, and geoserver for the superoverlays (and maybe as the default target for the db storage?). An upgrade would be good, but if h2 updates the db on disk there is no going back, so it should be made on trunk only. Cheers Andrea -- ------------------------------------------------------- Ing. Andrea Aime GeoSolutions S.A.S. Tech lead Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 962313 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/ http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime http://twitter.com/geowolf ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-d2d-2 _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
