On 08/08/12 20:08, Andrea Aime wrote: > I only managed to have a quick look at the patch so far, if you don't > mind as the current referencing > maintainer I would like to give it a better look during the weekend > before it get committed.
Thanks, if you are the module maintainer I am more than happy for you review the patch. > What I'm wondering after this first look into the patch is the expected > axis order of the new syntax. > The urn form is supposed to be in lat/lon no matter what the referencing > hints are, if the new one is > going to be used for WFS I believe that also will have to respect the > same rules as the URN one. Exactly, that is the goal of the refactoring: common behaviour through code reuse. The new HTTP URI form has the same lat/lon behaviour as the URN form. According to the javadoc, the implementation of the URN form is that lon/lat can be forced by setting Hints.FORCE_AXIS_ORDER_HONORING to include "urn". For HTTP URI this is "http-uri". Both factories ignore this hint set to "http" (as recognised by HTTP_AuthorityFactory); this appears to be tested in URN_AuthorityFactoryTest; HTTP_URI_AuthorityFactoryTest does exactly the same. I say appears because gt-referencing is a jungle and it is often hard to tell what is going on. Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> Software Engineer CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
