That is my understanding; and the official response seems to be that it is not
a problem. I was focused on a much more short term problem of getting uDig
migrated to 9-SNAPSHOT (which is now accomplished).
--
Jody Garnett
On Wednesday, 12 September 2012 at 6:28 PM, Michael Bedward wrote:
> Ah sorry - got my wires crossed.
>
> So when a user is working against a snapshot, and not building
> GeoTools locally, the problem of their local repo filling up with
> time-stamped jars still looms ?
>
> Michael
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
