As per Monday's meeting, discussion has finished up (Ben's questions were
answered by going through the email history).
There are still a few questions listed in the tasks section
Q: Is secret...@osgeo.org for email correct?
I will ask bo...@osgeo.org
Q: Do we have a fax number for the foundation?
I will ask bo...@osgeo.org
Q: Do we need to contact pervious contributors?
A: Not required, previous contributors clearly provided code to the foundation
so we are good.
Q: Do we need to contact current contributors?
A: Perhaps, if only so we are all operating on the same terms & conditions.
If you are content with the above vote +1, if not discuss and we can revise the
proposal.
--
Jody Garnett
On Sunday, 3 February 2013 at 11:53 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Proposal is up:
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Replace+Contribution+Agreement
>
> I had a couple questions in the "tasks" section which may be worth
> discussion.
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
