The one question mark I have is that, because this patch adds a new dependency, xml-commons-resolver, is it backwards compatible? This might break builds of users who have manually collected dependencies and are not using Maven. Do we support these users? Does a new non-test dependency count as an incompatible change? I am inclined to say no, and vote +1 for the backport, but I would like confirmation from core developers.
Kind regards, Ben. On 28/02/13 16:21, Mauro Bartolomeoli wrote: > Hi everybody, > as 8.7 release is finally out, could this be a good moment to merge > SchemaResolver patch to 8.x branch? > > Just to remember a few things: > * this is the branch to merge: > https://github.com/mbarto/geotools/tree/8.x_geot_4386 > * the patch should be quite safe as it mantains code compatibility for > app-schema modules and for GeoServer > > Any blocker? Could you please vote for this? > > Thanks, > Mauro Bartolomeoli > > > -- > == > Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for > more information. > == > > Dott. Mauro Bartolomeoli > @mauro_bart > Senior Software Engineer > > GeoSolutions S.A.S. > Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 > 55054 Massarosa (LU) > Italy > phone: +39 0584 962313 > fax: +39 0584 1660272 > > http://www.geo-solutions.it > http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it > > ------------------------------------------------------- -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> Software Engineer CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
