Focusing in on the last topic, thanks for the hard work on styling Andrea.

> - would make more sense to mark the rule rather then the individual
>> symbolizers?
>>
>
> What do you mean by marking the rule?
>

You are proposing marking symbolizers with <VendorOption
name="evaluationMode">firstMatch</VendorOption>

I was having trouble untangling what that would mean in my head.

I expected the SLD you generated uses "first match" all over the place so
that usually "the most specific" rule gets chosen ... and you do not have
to keep processing?

In cases where "first match" symbolizers are being combined with normal
symbolizers I got confused....


Rule A: filter type="town"
- sym 1
- sym 2 "first match"
- sym 3
Rule B: filter population < 10000
- sym 4

For a feature with type="town" and population=6000 we would get the
following generated list of symbolizers
- sym 1
- sym 2 "first match"
- sym 3
- sym 4

I would expect this change to "Draw" the feature using  the
- sym 1
- sym 2 "first match"
- sym 4


Hence my question if it would be easier to mark the entire Rule - saying
all these symbolizers are "first match".


Rule A (first match) filter type="town"
- sym 1
- sym 2

Rule B:
- sym 3

For a feature with type="town" we would get
- sym 1
- sym 2

For a feature type="village" we would get
- sym 3

It may be faster to connect on IRC or Skype as I expect you could talk me
through the above confusion.
--
Jody
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to