Not having heard any feedback on this one I have gone ahead and submitted
the pull requests.
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/687
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/884
Thanks!
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Justin Deoliveira <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Here is my first cut at updating the database.
>
> As per Andreas suggestion I also pulled out the change log for all the
> versions. I took the liberty of doing some formatting of it.
>
> https://gist.github.com/jdeolive/5e5c304dc741e0ebf24a
>
> (I can make the script I used to generate it available if folks are
> interested)
>
> As you can see there are lots of changes. I am just not sure which ones
> (if any) warrant a closer look or might possibly lead to a regression. I
> ran the full set of unit tests for both geotools and geoserver and and
> aside from minor tweaks to a few floating point comparisons everything
> appears to be ok. Here are the relevant changes.
>
> https://github.com/jdeolive/geotools/compare/epsg-86
> https://github.com/jdeolive/geoserver/compare/epsg-86
>
> One thing worth noting is this change:
>
>
> https://github.com/jdeolive/geotools/blob/2a66e82b51da22b25a1d962af465fc5261b39bef/modules/library/referencing/src/main/java/org/geotools/referencing/cs/DefaultCoordinateSystemAxis.java#L916
>
> Which takes into account some new aliases that were added for axis
> direction.
>
> Let me know what y'all think.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Justin
>
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Justin Deoliveira <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Cool, thanks for the info guys. I'll work on this over the next few days
>> to try and get something in for the freeze.
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:28 AM, Andrea Aime <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:35 AM, Justin Deoliveira <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey folks,
>>>>
>>>> I was curious as to what our current policy for upgrading the internal
>>>> epsg database we ship? Does it just get done when somebody decides to do
>>>> it? Or is there a schedule of some sort?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yep, just like Jody said. The annoying part of the upgrade process is
>>> not much upgrading the db itself, but
>>> going after the regression caused by EPSG changing the meaning of
>>> parameters, moving them around, and so on.
>>>
>>> It does not happen all that often, but going by memory once every two
>>> upgrades I have to fix one or more things around
>>> to make things work, and there are still at least one bug report open
>>> about regressions caused by upgrades on less used
>>> projections.
>>>
>>> Soo... when upgrading one should read though the changelogs and see if
>>> any projection parameter has been changed,
>>> moved, renamed, or whatever... which makes the process annoying.
>>>
>>> If we are to upgrade the EPSG database it has to be done in the next 10
>>> days, before the freeze
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Andrea
>>>
>>> --
>>> ==
>>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
>>> http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information.
>>> ==
>>>
>>> Ing. Andrea Aime
>>> @geowolf
>>> Technical Lead
>>>
>>> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
>>> Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
>>> 55054 Massarosa (LU)
>>> Italy
>>> phone: +39 0584 962313
>>> fax: +39 0584 1660272
>>> mob: +39 339 8844549
>>>
>>> http://www.geo-solutions.it
>>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>>>
>>> *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*
>>>
>>> Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
>>> nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
>>> loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
>>> per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
>>> messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
>>> darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
>>> stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
>>> divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
>>> utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
>>> principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely
>>> for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential
>>> or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
>>> (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
>>> Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
>>> copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
>>> strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
>>> addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
>>> immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
>>> information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
>>> does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
>>> completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility for changes
>>> made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
>>> e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>
>>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
