You're right, I can just put it in main,seeing it already depends on wfs-ng.
See https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/1724
Regards
Niels
On 26-07-16 22:06, Jody Garnett wrote:
Thanks, reviewed merged and closed GEOT-5222.
I am not sure about the test:
- it may be sufficient to copy the test to core (since it is testing
the functionality of the geoserver catalog)
- it may also be fine as a community module (as you indicated) to
verify the change of functionality; it can be removed after the
transition is complete
--
Jody Garnett
On 26 July 2016 at 05:16, Niels Charlier <ni...@scitus.be
<mailto:ni...@scitus.be>> wrote:
Hi Jody,
I wasn't able this time, I will make up for it next time.
I have new PR for getCount() issue:
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1252
I also made a branch on my own repo with a community module that
proves backwards compatibility between wfsng and wfs from a
geoserver point of view.
I don't know if this is what @Andrea wanted and if it is sufficient.
I also don't know if it is worth committing this (and creating a
new module just for this little test) or the fact that I did it is
enough:
https://github.com/NielsCharlier/geoserver/tree/wfsng
Regards
Niels
On 26-07-16 04:48, Jody Garnett wrote:
Thanks Niels, I picked up the other wgs-ng patch during the
friday sprint. I was sorry you did not join us as it would of
been good to collaborate on this.
I am going to start prepping the migration of AbstractDataStore
to a community module in anticipation of your success fixing wfs-ng.
--
Jody Garnett
On 25 July 2016 at 12:35, Niels Charlier <ni...@scitus.be
<mailto:ni...@scitus.be>> wrote:
Hi Jody,
I've added a patch for WFS2.0 in MapServer to the existing PR.
A couple more fixes are coming.
Regards
Niels
On 22-07-16 18:45, Jody Garnett wrote:
Thanks for the positive feedback, Niels has a couple of pull
requests ready and then we should be able to complete the
"migration" ... perhaps later today!
--
Jody Garnett
On 22 July 2016 at 09:12, Pierre Mauduit
<pierre.maud...@camptocamp.com
<mailto:pierre.maud...@camptocamp.com>> wrote:
Hi,
(perhaps due to lack of use).
FYI we stumbled upon several issues with the classic wfs
module in the geOrchestra extraction webapp (mainly
related to basic-authentication being dropped across
requests, but we are using a quite old geotools version
too). We migrated to wfs-ng in february, and it works
way better in our case (we might have had some weird
behaviour with the WFS namespaces though).
Regards,
-- Pierre
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and
traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and
protocols are
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow,
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity
planning
reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network
bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps,
and protocols are
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support
for NetFlow,
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using
capacity planning
reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
