repo.boundlessgeo.com We cannot fall back to osgeo repo as it does not have all the stuff. What I can do is talk to sac about putting up our own nexus or artifactory. Would the PSC be in position to cover some of my time setting that up? Or would planet have capacity to work on this and help transfer content...
build.geoserver.org how much of this is portable to a new organization? How much does it cost to run; if we decide to pay for it etc... -- Jody Garnett On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 19:13, Torben Barsballe <torbenbarsba...@gmail.com> wrote: > Attending > > Toben Barsballe > > Ian Turton > > Andrea Aimee > > Jukka Rahkonnen > Actions from last meeting > > - > > All: Please reply to MBStyle Graduation geotools thread > - > > Jody: will tighten up the javadocs “SimpleFeatureCollection house rules > ” > - > > Andrea: to clean up the 22.3 artifacts from the OSGeo repository (may > need a follow-up on Boundless repo though) (done) > - > > Gabriel: move ArcSDE to unsupported (done) > > Agenda > > - > > GeoServer + GeoWebCache Site hosting > - > > FOSS4G presentations > - > > Windows installer machine from OSGeo > - > > Upgrading checkstyle, oh my > > Actions > N/A > GeoServer + GeoWebCache Site hosting > > Talks underway to move management of the sites outside Planet. > > Bunch of sites: > > - > > geoserver.org hosted on github pages, but DNS and certificates managed > by Planet > - > > docs.geoserver.org > - > > www.geowebcache.org > - > > Artifactory at repo.boundlessgeo.com (can we fall back on the OSGeo > one?) > - > > build.geoserver.org > > > FOSS4G 2020 presentations > > Andrea and Jody and GeoSolutions have been submitting presentations for > the pre-selection. > > State of GeoServer (but also ecosystem, introduction, frenzy), GeoServer > in production, WPS, Web Mercator, The life of open source developers, OG > API, OSM, Burnout, State of GeoWebCache. Want to add more? Please! > Windows/OSX installer machine from OSGeo > > We should ask OSGeo to get machines to run the installers. Could be useful > for other projects as well, and receive little usage, could be shared. Jody > already voiced this idea, I’d like to see it get going. > > Question: what about 32 bit restrictions for service installer? Maybe we > could drop the service installer part and suggest using Tomcat instead, and > link to documentation on how to set it up for production using Tomcat. > > Note: 32-bit Java 11 is available from AdoptOpenJDK > Upgrading checkstyle, oh my > > https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/2781 > > > _______________________________________________ > GeoTools-Devel mailing list > GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel >
_______________________________________________ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
