Hello Daniele Thanks for the feedback!
First of all, I know about the memory issue when not using JAI, not complaining. But things should ideally always work when using JAI, right..? OK, here we go: > I guess I have applied the same workaround. Did you simply changed the > DirectEpsgFactory and AbstractEpsgFactory code (fixing the Unit for > 9108)? > I have some issues in reprojecting SAD69. Yes, pretty much that. > - URUC_UTM63_WGS84.ecw: result was all black (!) with or without JAI > > Worked fine for me without JAI. OK, now it works for me too, both with and without JAI! (guess it was one of your corrections?) > - URUC_UTM63_WGS84.sid: infinite loop with JAI, OK without JAI > > Worked fine for me without JAI. Now it also works in both cases, great. Strange is that it takes a much much longer time with this MrSID file, as compared with the equivalent ECW sample. OK, ECW is much faster, but I guess it shouldn't take that long since the image is not really that big. A quick look tells me that some other tests here also seem to be working now. What were the issues that you found when reprojecting SAD69? Let's see what your other results show! Cheers Milton Daniele Romagnoli wrote: > Hi Milton, > I'm doing some preliminar tests with your sample data. > I have also fixed a missing import which prevented some EPSG code parsing. > > Here below, some feedbacks. > -- Milton Jonathan Grupo GIS e Meio Ambiente Tecgraf/PUC-Rio Tel: +55-21-3527-2502 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-gt2-users mailing list Geotools-gt2-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
