mbedward wrote: > > > I think it's likely that you're boldly going where no one else has > gone before Tom :-) > >
Yes, it's exciting to be a pioneer - sometimes too exciting. ;-) I think the problem was the source/binary setting with the POM file - should be 1.5 (per your excellent documentation), I had it at 1.6. With the source/binary at 1.5 and the encoding at UTF-8, it does work with the latest build of the Java 1.7 beta (build B76). With it set at 1.6, I still get errors due to some characters that have ASCII values > 128. They appear to be in comments which may be why the 1.5 setting is ignoring them - I don't really know but thought I would share this. -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Geotools-2-6-0-and-Java-JDK-1-7-tp4094545p4100874.html Sent from the geotools-gt2-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual Experience, a free event focused on virtualization and cloud computing. Attend in-depth sessions from your desk. Your couch. Anywhere. http://p.sf.net/sfu/redhat-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Geotools-gt2-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
