Martin Tomko ha scritto: > Dear all, > this has been discussed before, in the times when Geotidy was planned to > become Geotools 3...
That was never planned, it was just the wish of the people that eventually forked GeoTools into GeoToolkit. But has never been an official project position. > There has been a need to format the prj generated > for shapefiles to be compatible with ESRI soft. Has this been somehow > resolved? I did some work months ago to allow better matching between ESRI and ESPG code when it comes to guess which EPSG code is associated to an ESRI fabricated prj. > I have a problem specifically with the EPSG:3035 which looks different > in the GT output and in ESRI. > If not, not a big deal for the moment, but maybe we should re-visit this... Not sure there is much that can be done... the EPSG database is the official reference for all OGC compliant software. Everything else we can eventually try to be compatible with, but it's an extra. I guess that, to some extent, we could make prj generation ESRI compatible, like for example by using ESRI projection names or datum names in place of the official ones. Specifically, what differences are you talking about? Are you interested in working on this and providing a patch? Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geotools-gt2-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
