Hi Andrea,
I just had the need to export some featurecollesction and check for the 
correctness of results in ArcGis with some other data, as a quick 
visualization workaround - I don't do visualization in GT...(I guess I 
should use uDig for this, eh?). Anyway, this has resulted in an error 
from the prj. so I googled it and asked.
It is not critical for me now, and I also think we should stick with the 
official database.

Not sure what else could be done... I do not have the time and resources 
to figure a patch, but I guess that an optional parameter to 
newDataStore.forceSchemaCRS(crs, "authority"); could be done, where one 
could avoid it, defaulting to EPSG, or specify ESRI or Oracle or 
whatever... this would require an additional DB of definitions which 
would be a pain to maintain, I guess...

Martin

On 5/20/2010 3:02 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Martin Tomko ha scritto:
>> Dear all,
>> this has been discussed before, in the times when Geotidy was planned 
>> to become Geotools 3... 
>
> That was never planned, it was just the wish of the people that 
> eventually forked GeoTools into GeoToolkit. But has never been an 
> official project position.
>
>> There has been a need to format the prj generated for shapefiles to 
>> be compatible with ESRI soft. Has this been somehow resolved?
>
> I did some work months ago to allow better matching between ESRI
> and ESPG code when it comes to guess which EPSG code is associated
> to an ESRI fabricated prj.
>
>> I have a problem specifically with the EPSG:3035 which looks 
>> different in the GT output and in ESRI.
>> If not, not a big deal for the moment, but maybe we should re-visit 
>> this...
>
> Not sure there is much that can be done... the EPSG database is the 
> official reference for all OGC compliant software. Everything else
> we can eventually try to be compatible with, but it's an extra.
>
> I guess that, to some extent, we could make prj generation ESRI 
> compatible, like for example by using ESRI projection names or
> datum names in place of the official ones.
>
> Specifically, what differences are you talking about? Are you interested
> in working on this and providing a patch?
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>


-- 
Martin Tomko
Postdoctoral Research Assistant

Geographic Information Systems Division
Department of Geography
University of Zurich - Irchel
Winterthurerstr. 190
CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland

email:  [email protected]
site:   http://www.geo.uzh.ch/~mtomko
mob:    +41-788 629 558
tel:    +41-44-6355256
fax:    +41-44-6356848


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Geotools-gt2-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users

Reply via email to