On 8/30/06, Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 30 Aug 2006, at 19:26, Andy Armstrong wrote: > > Since then I've slightly lost track of the flow of the discussion. > Is anyone still interested in doing /that/ (and for now /just/ > that)? :)
Sorry for derailing your original topic - I've 'forked it'
Oh, and further to that I'm in the process of getting control of Geo::Gpx (although it'd be better if it were called Geo::GPX) which is currently incomplete with a view to fleshing it out as a complete general purpose GPX parser / generator. Next up I plan to visit
My point for jumping is was there there is a lot of details you're looking up, making into algorithms, etc. So what I'd like to do would be to either find comparable libraries for what you're adding, or develop them in parallel (more like delayed). Maybe keep with a similar interface, and arch for the simple tools so that maintaining them across languages is easy and documentation/references can be consistent. Andrew -- Andrew Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] 42.4266N x 83.4931W http://highearthorbit.com Northville, Michigan, USA _______________________________________________ Geowanking mailing list [email protected] http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
