Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it not more valuable to have interfaces that are appropriate to the individual languages? A perlish interface isn't necessarily a pythonish interface - and neither of them are likely to be anything like the C or C++ interface to the same functionality. Well, apart from fairly simple APIs - in which case it seems moot.
I'm thinking more abstractly. General inputs/outputs, config options, etc. Parse GPX File (file, split_distance, split_time, offset, ...) Distance ([lat1, lon1, <alt1>], [lat2, lon2, <alt2>], model) ...etc... But maybe that is too specific across languages. At the very least defining general problem s/patterns, features, and referenced standards. Andrew -- Andrew Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] 42.4266N x 83.4931W http://highearthorbit.com Northville, Michigan, USA _______________________________________________ Geowanking mailing list [email protected] http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
