In my reading of the click-through, it's about equal to the most
liberal creative commons license. Anyone out there on the OGC Planning
Committee who can propose we get rid of this old, legacy terminology
and just adopt one of the nice, new CC licenses?
But on the the question of having someone you might pass the spec on
to agreeing to the license terms, isn't this the same as with any
license? Or are you saying that the license is obnoxious if it makes
*you* responsible for getting licensing agreement from the person to
whom you transfer the document?
---
Raj
On Apr 23, 2008, at 10:06 PM, Allan Doyle wrote:
Allan, you asked for a non license-agreement copy of something. Did
you mean of the spec or just the documentation?
I meant the spec. OGC has developed a silly click-through license
that I have trouble parsing. It's either entirely benign, in which
case why is it there? Or it requires me to make sure that anyone I
might pass the spec on to must agree to the click-through, in which
case the spec is not particularly useful to me.
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
