Hi Allan,

I checked on it, and apparently we're restricted the same as anyone
else, so we can't distribute the spec.

Sorry,
Mano

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Allan Doyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  On Apr 23, 2008, at 6:29 PM, Mano Marks wrote:
>
> > Hi y'all,
> >
> > I just wanted to address a couple of the points raised on the thread.
> > To be completely out there, in case you missed my email address, I
> > work for Google supporting Geo APIs.
> >
> > Mike asked if the OGC owns the future of KML. It does. Google no
> > longer owns any KML IP.. The OGC owns all of it. Google is a member of
> > the OGC, and we hope to be one of the drivers of innovation, but we
> > don't own it or have any special privileges other OGC members don't
> > have.
> >
> > Allan, you asked for a non license-agreement copy of something. Did
> > you mean of the spec or just the documentation?
> >
>
>  I meant the spec. OGC has developed a silly click-through license that I
> have trouble parsing. It's either entirely benign, in which case why is it
> there? Or it requires me to make sure that anyone I might pass the spec on
> to must agree to the click-through, in which case the spec is not
> particularly useful to me.
>
>
>
> >
> > This link:
> > http://schemas.opengis.net/kml/2.2.0/
> > doesn't require signing a license
> >
> > Also, the KML 2.2 SWG at OGC is also open:
> > http://www.opengeospatial.org/projects/groups/kml2.2swg
> >
> > Also, the KML docs on Google's site are pretty up to date.
> > http://code.google.com/apis/kml/documentation/
> >
> > If it is a different doc, I can see if I can get it for you.
> >
>
>  Post the spec somewhere w/o the click through and I'm a happy camper.
>
>         Allan
>
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > Mano
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Allan Doyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > It's a little hard to tell, they have a click-through license at the OGC
> > > site. Does Google have a non-DRM'ed copy anywhere?
> > >
> > >       Allan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Apr 18, 2008, at 2:37 PM, Mike Liebhold wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > More (perhaps old) news ( 4/13)   " OGC(R) Approves KML as Open
> Standard"
> > > >
> > > The formal press release from OGC appended below, and this on a google
> blog
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> http://google-latlong.blogspot.com/2008/04/kml-new-standard-for-sharing-maps.html
> > >
> > > >
> > > > "Starting today, Google no longer controls KML. The Open Geospatial
> > > >
> > > Consortium (OGC), an international standards body, has announced the
> > > completion of KML's standardization process. KML has become an OGC
> Standard,
> > > and the OGC will take responsibility for maintaining and extending it.
> This
> > > transfer of ownership is a strong reflection of Google's commitment to
> open
> > > standards. Fundamentally, our interest is not to control information,
> but
> > > rather to encourage its spread."
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Despite this  announcement , does the OGC community  actually now
> 'own'
> > > >
> > > the future of kml?  I'm not sure.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps someone more knowledgeable can comment  on whether not Google
> > > >
> > > actually still controls KML destiny, with all of their queued up kml3.0
> and
> > > beyond features and extensions  they can unilaterally adopt and
> implement
> > > in google earth, before submission or adoption by OGC committees.
> > >
> > > > I'm also wondering about highlights of alignment with GML, and what
> major
> > > >
> > > elements are left out  or postponed in this 'standard' version.  Some 3d
> > > elements perhaps?
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Raj or Carl or  Ron anyone in the OGC  KML groups care to share any
> > > >
> > > comments?  (Andrew?)
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > >
> > > > http://www.opengeospatial.org/pressroom/pressreleases/857
> > > >
> > > > OGC(R) Approves KML as Open Standard
> > > >
> > > > Wayland, Mass., April 14, 2008 - The members of the Open Geospatial
> > > >
> > > Consortium, Inc. (OGC) today announced the approval of the OpenGIS(R)
> KML
> > > Encoding Standard (OGC KML), marking KML's transition into an open
> standard
> > > which will be maintained by the OGC. Developers will now have a standard
> > > approach for using KML to code and share visual geographic content in
> > > existing or future web-based online maps and 3D geospatial browsers like
> > > Google EarthTM.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > "We are pleased to see the adoption of KML as an OGC standard," said
> Ron
> > > >
> > > Lake, chairman and chief executive officer of Galdos Systems Inc. "We
> > > believe that this is a major step forward for the OGC and for the entire
> > > geographic information community, as it provides the first broadly
> accepted
> > > standard for the visualization of geographic information."
> > >
> > > >
> > > > "Geographic data adds tremendous value to the online experience. More
> and
> > > >
> > > more people are looking for ways to incorporate location information
> into
> > > their online content," said Michael Weiss-Malik, KML product manager for
> > > Google. "The standardization of KML makes it possible for both novice
> and
> > > expert users alike to publish and share geographical information in an
> open
> > > format. It's not unlike web browsers' standardized support for HTML,
> which
> > > allows any web browser to read any web page."
> > >
> > > >
> > > > KML version 2.2 was brought into the OGC consensus process by a
> submission
> > > >
> > > team led by Google and Galdos Systems Inc.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > KML is an XML-based programming language, originally developed to
> manage
> > > >
> > > the display of geospatial data in Google Earth. It's still used heavily
> in
> > > Google Earth but is also supported by a variety of vendors' tools and
> > > mapping websites.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > The OpenGIS KML 2.2 Encoding Standard formalizes the KML 2.2 model and
> > > >
> > > language while remaining backwards compatible with existing KML 2.2
> files
> > > and tools. In comparison with the GoogleTM KML 2.2 Reference, the
> standard
> > > defines:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > * the KML 2.2 geometry encoding and interpolation model
> > > > * an extension model in support of application profiles
> > > > * conformance requirements and test cases
> > > >
> > > > The adopted OpenGIS KML 2.2 Encoding Standard (OGC KML) is available
> at
> > > > http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/kml/.
> > > >
> > > > About the OGC
> > > >
> > > > The OGC(R) is an international consortium of more than 345 companies,
> > > >
> > > government agencies, research organizations, and universities
> participating
> > > in a consensus process to develop publicly available geospatial
> standards.
> > > OpenGIS(R) Standards support interoperable solutions that "geo-enable"
> the
> > > Web, wireless and location-based services, and mainstream IT. OGC
> Standards
> > > empower technology developers to make geospatial information and
> services
> > > accessible and useful with any application that needs to be geospatially
> > > enabled. Visit the OGC website at http://www.opengeospatial.org/.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Google and Google Earth are trademarks of Google Inc.
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Geowanking mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Geowanking mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Join me at Google's biggest developer event of the year
> > May 28-29, San Francisco
> > http://code.google.com/events/io
> > _______________________________________________
> > Geowanking mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
> >
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Geowanking mailing list
>  [email protected]
>  http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
>



-- 
Join me at Google's biggest developer event of the year
May 28-29, San Francisco
http://code.google.com/events/io
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking

Reply via email to