stephen white wrote:
If we agree on some basic ideas like "3d is probably a good idea", then how about an absolute minimum 3d environment which is not compelling to anyone else but geowankers?
Stephen, I disagree - I think 3D is a sterile dead end distraction. I am personally doubtful that you could get a very large proportion of this list to agree on anything. > That's not the point though. The point is that we're sitting around > typing into email, waiting for the next belt on the head. That's not > efficient. Well, it works a lot better for me than to go around searching for bats, and hitting myself over the head with them to see if they feel good. OK, basically I don't get what the hell you are talking about. You could be blowing smoke out your ass from all I can get out of your "typing into email". Best regards, -- ---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, [EMAIL PROTECTED] light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam and watch the world go round - Rush | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org _______________________________________________ Geowanking mailing list [email protected] http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
